Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 19;145(1):411.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06034-0.

Highly porous 3-D printed tritanium acetabular shell for aseptic revision total hip : Arthroplasty: minimum 2-year prospective follow up of 101 implants

Affiliations

Highly porous 3-D printed tritanium acetabular shell for aseptic revision total hip : Arthroplasty: minimum 2-year prospective follow up of 101 implants

Nick David Clement et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. .

Abstract

Aims: To assess the survival, complications, patient-reported outcomes and radiographic integration of the uncemented Trident® II tritanium acetabular component when used for aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA).

Methods: A single-centre prospective cohort study of 101 aseptic rTHA in 100 patients was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were patients suitable for the use of the uncemented acetabular component, aged 18-95 years, willing and able to comply with the study protocol, and provide informed consent. Those with inadequate bone stock to support fixation of the prosthesis were excluded. Functional assessments included the Oxford hip score, Forgotten joint score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, pain VAS and satisfaction. Radiographic assessment included acetabular lucent lines and lysis according to Delee and Charnley zones and loosening.

Results: The mean age was 72.5 (standard deviation 11.6) and consisted of 54 females and 46 males. Mean follow-up was 3.1 (range 2 to 4.9) years during which 10 patients died. Indication for rTHA included: loosening of the acetabulum (n = 82), instability (n = 11), broken femoral stem (n = 3), metal on metal with pain and pseudotumour (n = 2), pain (n = 2) and loosening of femoral component (n = 1). There were two re-revisions for deep infection. This resulted in a 1-year all-cause survival of 99.0% (95% CI 97.1 to 100) and 4-year survival of 96.2% (95% CI 90.5 to 100). There was only one case with lucent lines in all three zones and had not osseointegrated, but the component remained stable at 3-years follow-up. All PROMs demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement, which was significant (p < 0.001) at both 1- and 2-years. Patient satisfaction with their revision THA was 85.6% and 85.3% at 1- and 2-years.

Conclusion: The uncemented highly porous 3-dimensional printed Trident® II tritanium acetabular component was associated with excellent survivorship, clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs, and high patient satisfaction in the short term when used for aseptic rTHA.

Keywords: 3-D; Arthroplasty; Hip; Outcome; Revision; Survival; Tritanium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519 - PubMed
    1. Farrow L, McLoughlin J, Gaba S, Ashcroft GP (2022) Future demand for primary hip and knee arthroplasty in Scotland. Musculoskelet Care 21(2):355–61
    1. Evans JT, Evans JP, Walker RW, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Sayers A (2019) How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet 393(10172):647–654 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty Churchill Livingstone 35(6):S79–S85
    1. Kim JT, Yoo JJ (2016) Implant design in cementless hip arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis 28(2):65–75 - PubMed - PMC

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources