Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 19:dc250452.
doi: 10.2337/dc25-0452. Online ahead of print.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial

Affiliations

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial

Laura C Kusinski et al. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but optimal metrics, ranges, and targets in this population are undefined. We assessed associations between CGM metrics and pregnancy outcomes in GDM.

Research design and methods: During the DiGest study, 425 women with GDM (diagnosed at median [IQR] 25.1 [18.3-27.7] weeks) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 received a dietary intervention, with masked Dexcom G6 CGM at 29 (n = 361), 32 (n = 215), and 36 (n = 227) weeks' gestation. For this secondary analysis, we used logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the Youden index to assess associations and predictive ability of CGM metrics, including pregnancy-specific time in range (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L]) and pregnancy outcomes.

Results: CGM metrics at 29 weeks were significantly associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Participants achieving mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), TIRp ≥90%, or pregnancy-specific time above range (TARp) <10% at 29 weeks had a significantly lower risk of LGA (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [95% CI 0.22, 0.77], 0.38 [0.20, 0.70], and 0.39 [0.20, 0.73], respectively) and SGA (0.26 [0.08, 0.79], 0.30 [0.10, 0.91], and 0.19 [0.06, 0.62], respectively). TARp <10% and mean nocturnal glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) were associated with a reduced odds of preterm birth (OR 0.40 [0.17, 0.94] and 0.42 [0.19, 0.97], respectively). A stricter range (63-120 mg/dL [3.5-6.7 mmol/L]) had similar performance overall, but had no single statistically robust TIR/TAR target across all outcomes.

Conclusions: In women with GDM, CGM mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), ≥90% TIRp, or <10% TARp using a range of 63-140 mg/dL (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) at 29 weeks' gestation was associated with a low risk of suboptimal offspring outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer