A standardized nontargeted metabolomics method for cross-laboratory comparison of food profiles
- PMID: 40829463
- DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.145934
A standardized nontargeted metabolomics method for cross-laboratory comparison of food profiles
Abstract
Food composition has been traditionally defined by 35-160 chemical components with established nutritional significance for human health. Modern omics technologies have revealed that the chemical complexity of food is far greater, offering the potential to deepen our understanding of food composition to more precisely inform data-driven solutions across food systems. However, challenges in generating comparable omics data have limited the utility of omics technologies at the scale required to expand food composition databases. Herein, we present a standardized nontargeted LC-MS metabolomics method, supported by a novel internal retention time standard (IRTS) mixture of compounds non-endogenous to food that enables robust chromatographic alignment of data across laboratories. Our results demonstrate qualitative consensus of features across laboratories and/or instrumentation. This approach establishes the foundation for comparable, nontargeted omics analysis to support the next generation of food composition data.
Keywords: Food; Metabolomics; Nontargeted; Standardization.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jessica Prenni reports financial support was provided by The Rockefeller Foundation. Jessica Prenni reports financial support was provided by Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research. Jessica Prenni reports financial support was provided by Atrium Health. Chi-Ming Chien, Tracy Shafizadeh, Steve Watkins reports a relationship with Verso Biosciences that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources