Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 18;15(8):e105951.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105951.

Evaluating pharmacist prescribing education programmes: a realist synthesis protocol

Affiliations

Evaluating pharmacist prescribing education programmes: a realist synthesis protocol

Kristin Xenos et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmacist prescribing has evolved to meet healthcare system needs, but the effectiveness, mechanisms and contextual factors influencing education programmes remain poorly understood. Realist approaches are fairly novel in pharmacy practice research. This realist synthesis aims to answer the question: to what extent do pharmacy prescribing education programs work (or not), for whom and under what circumstances, and why?

Methods and analysis: A realist methodology (realist synthesis) will be used to review the outcomes of programmes. Pawson's key stages will be followed: (1) clarifying the scope; (2) determining the search strategy; (3) study selection; (4) extracting and analysing data; and (5) synthesising findings and drawing conclusions. The synthesis will follow Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses-Evolving Standards publication guidelines. Data extracted will include the study characteristics, alongside the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of varied pharmacy prescribing education programmes. The search strategy will include searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete. An initial programme theory will use selected grey literature. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations will be identified, and recurring patterns will be synthesised to refine the initial programme theory.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required. Dissemination will be sought via peer-reviewed academic conferences and journals.

Prospero registration number: CRD420251056576.

Keywords: EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); Pharmacists; Prescriptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Zhou M, Desborough J, Parkinson A, et al. Barriers to pharmacist prescribing: a scoping review comparing the UK, New Zealand, Canadian and Australian experiences. Int J Pharm Pract. 2019;27:479–89. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12557. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mesbahi Z, Piquer-Martinez C, Benrimoj SI, et al. Pharmacists as independent prescribers in community pharmacy: A scoping review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2025;21:142–53. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walpola RL, Issakhany D, Gisev N, et al. The accessibility of pharmacist prescribing and impacts on medicines access: A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024;20:475–86. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. [20-Feb-2025]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/intersection/activity/ed Available. Accessed.
    1. Tonna AP, Stewart D, West B, et al. Pharmacist prescribing in the UK - a literature review of current practice and research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:545–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2007.00867.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources