Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug 18;12(2):e003517.
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003517.

Exploring sex differences in mortality among acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Exploring sex differences in mortality among acute myocardial infarction

Lorenzo Cangiano et al. Open Heart. .

Abstract

Background: Women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) experience higher mortality rates than men. This disparity is influenced by factors such as older age, greater comorbidity burden, atypical symptom presentation and delays in treatment. This study analysed patients with AMI (2003-2018) from the Lombardy Health Database (Italy) to examine sex differences in in-hospital and 1-year mortality and the role of age, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and postdischarge therapy.

Methods and results: Among 263 564 patients with AMI (93 363 women, 170 201 men), primary and secondary endpoints were in-hospital and 1-year mortality, respectively. Path analysis evaluated the direct and indirect effects of sex on outcomes, incorporating age, PCI and postdischarge therapy as mediators. Women had higher in-hospital (10% vs 5%; p<0.0001) and 1-year mortality (24% vs 14%; p<0.0001) but were less likely to receive PCI (40% vs 61%; p<0.0001) and postdischarge therapy (dual antiplatelet therapy 53% vs 63%; ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers 60% vs 64%; beta blockers 53% vs 61%; lipid-lowering drugs 45% vs 58%; p<0.0001 for all differences). After adjusting for age, major comorbidities, PCI and postdischarge treatment, mortality differences were no longer significant (adjusted OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.07 for in-hospital mortality) or even reversed (adjusted HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96 for 1-year mortality). Path analysis showed that female sex directly contributed 12% to in-hospital mortality and 4% to 1-year mortality, while age and undertreatment accounted for most of the disparity (88% and 96%, respectively).

Conclusion: Women with AMI face higher mortality largely due to older age and undertreatment during hospitalisation and after discharge. Addressing these gaps could improve outcomes.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The percentage of cardiovascular drug classes recommended by guidelines and prescribed to women and men after hospital discharge. ACEi, ACE inhibitor; ARBs, angiotensin receptor blockers.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Primary and secondary endpoint rates in women and men, considered overall and stratified by acute myocardial infarction type. NSTEMI, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves for 1-year mortality stratified by sex.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Path diagram of the causal effects linking sex, age and undertreatment (PCI alone for in-hospital mortality, and PCI and postdischarge guideline-recommended therapy for 1-year mortality) with in-hospital (A) and 1-year mortality (B) in the whole study population. The table in panel B details the contribution of each component of undertreatment. ACEi, ACE inhibitor; ARBs, angiotensin receptor blockers; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Rates of in-hospital and 1-year mortality in women and men throughout the study period (2003–2018).

Similar articles

References

    1. Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:916–47. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000351. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuehnemund L, Koeppe J, Feld J, et al. Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction-A nationwide German real-life analysis from 2014 to 2017. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44:890–8. doi: 10.1002/clc.23662. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dey S, Flather MD, Devlin G, et al. Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart. 2009;95:20–6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.138537. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee CY, Liu KT, Lu HT, et al. Sex and gender differences in presentation, treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome, a 10 year study from a multi-ethnic Asian population: The Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0246474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246474. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huber E, Le Pogam MA, Clair C. Sex related inequalities in the management and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in Switzerland: cross sectional study. BMJ Med . 2022;1:e000300. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000300. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources