Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4:16:1534725.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1534725. eCollection 2025.

Circulating microRNAs as a potential biomarker for osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective clinical study

Affiliations

Circulating microRNAs as a potential biomarker for osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective clinical study

Yuqi Li et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: By analyzing the expression levels of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its correlation with diabetic osteoporosis (DOP), this study aims to identify potential biomarkers for the early prediction and screening of DOP.

Methods: A total of 120 patients with T2DM who received treatment in the endocrinology outpatient/inpatient department between January 2023 and June 2024, along with 90 healthy volunteers, were enrolled in this study. Based on the bone mineral density (BMD), the 120 T2DM patients were divided into three groups: normal group (54 cases), osteopenia group (38 cases), and osteoporosis group (28 cases). The differences in clinical data, laboratory test indicators and miRNA expression differences among the three groups were statistically analyzed, and the high-risk factors for DOP in T2DM patients were analyzed.

Results: Compared to healthy volunteers, patients with T2DM demonstrated significantly decreased levels of P1NP and miR-219a-5p, alongside elevated levels of β-CTX, miR-188-3p, and miR-19a/b. Additionally, miR-335-5p levels were notably reduced in T2DM patients. Among these markers, significant differences were observed in the expression levels of P1NP, β-CTX, and miRNA in T2DM patients. Further analysis revealed distinct expression patterns of miR-188-3p, miR-335-5p, and miR-19a/b across the three T2DM subgroups (osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone density groups). Specifically, miR-188-3p levels were 10.34 ± 1.26 in the osteoporosis group, 8.35 ± 1.33 in the osteopenia group, and 6.55 ± 1.18 in the normal group. Similarly, miR-335-5p levels were 0.44 ± 0.14, 0.67 ± 0.16, and 0.88 ± 0.15, respectively, while miR-19a/b levels were 4.04 ± 1.41, 3.19 ± 1.21, and 2.47 ± 1.24, respectively (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). These miRNAs also exhibited significant correlations with BMD at the hip and lumbar spine (P < 0.001 or P = 0.001), highlighting their potential role in bone metabolism and osteoporosis risk in T2DM patients.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the circulating levels of miR-188-3p, miR-335-5p, and miR-19a/b are significantly associated with the occurrence of DOP in T2DM patients. These miRNAs show potential as biomarkers for the early diagnosis of DOP.

Keywords: diabetic osteoporosis (DOP); early diagnosis; miRNA; osteoporosis; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment of the study participants in the primary cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the levels of P1NP (A), β-CTX (B), miR-219a-5p (C), miR-188-3p (D), miR-335-5p (E), and miR-19a/b (F) in T2DM patients and healthy volunteers. Circulating levels of miR-188-3p, miR-335-5p, and miR-19a/b were significantly associated with the development of DOP in T2DM patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curve analysis of β-CTX, miR-188-3p, miR-335-5p, and miR-19a/b as predictors of osteoporosis in T2DM, joint testing for maximum effectiveness.

Similar articles

References

    1. Wang L, Peng W, Zhao Z, Zhang M, Shi Z, Song Z, et al. Prevalence and treatment of diabetes in China, 2013-2018. JAMA. (2021) 326:2498–506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22208, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruze R, Liu T, Zou X, Song J, Chen Y, Xu R, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: connections in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1161521. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1161521, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prasad TN, Arjunan D, Pal R, Bhadada SK. Diabetes and osteoporosis. Indian J Orthop. (2023) 57:209–17. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01049-4, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalra S, Joshi A, Kapoor N. Osteoporosis and diabetes: The dual pandemics. J Pak Med Assoc. (2022) 72:1663–4. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.22-86, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schacter GI, Leslie WD. Diabetes and osteoporosis: part II, clinical management. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. (2021) 50:287–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.03.006, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources