The Italian cross-cultural adaptation of the Social Vulnerability Index
- PMID: 40832020
- PMCID: PMC12358436
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576223
The Italian cross-cultural adaptation of the Social Vulnerability Index
Abstract
Background: Social vulnerability is a key health domain that is associated with frailty and disability in older adults, informing clinical trajectories and outcomes both on an individual and at a population level. The underlying concept is that frailty develops with the accumulation of physical, psychological, and social deficits, and the identification of losses in the social domain may allow for designing tailored interventions in a timely fashion. The aim of the present study was to adapt the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to the Italian language and culture for these purposes.
Methods: The Italian version of the SVI (SVI-I) has been developed through a comprehensive cross-cultural adaptation of the original Canadian SVI. This process involved four steps: initial translation, synthesis of translations, back translation, and a Delphi procedure.
Results: The result of the study is the face-valid 38-item SVI-I. Based on the Delphi procedure, the SVI-I can be administered to Italian-speaking, over-65, community-dwelling individuals not affected by cognitive decline.
Conclusion: This study develops the first index to measure social vulnerability in the Italian-speaking population, aiming at a multidimensional approach to address social and healthcare needs. If proven effective in subsequent validation studies, it may enhance geriatric assessments, improve early social vulnerability detection, and support tailored care plans.
Keywords: Delphi consensus; Italian adaptation; Social Vulnerability Index; cross-cultural adaptation; frailty; social vulnerability.
Copyright © 2025 Mangini, Festari, Ottaviani, Tagliafico, Di Cara, Nencioni, Monacelli and Delphi Consensus Panel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Hooyman NR, Kiyak HA. Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective. 9th ed. London, UK: Pearson; (2011).
-
- Wallace LMK, Theou O, Pena F, Rockwood K, Andrew MK. Social vulnerability as a predictor of mortality and disability: cross-country differences in the survey of health, aging, and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Aging Clin Exp Res. (2015) 27:365–72. doi: 10.1007/s40520-014-0271-6, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sharifian N, Sol K, Zahodne LB, Antonucci TC. Social relationships and adaptation in later life In: Comprehensive clinical psychology: Elsevier; (2022) 52–72. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818697-8.00016-9 - DOI
-
- Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Verbrugge LM. Subjective well-being and social production functions. Soc Indic Res. (1999) 46:61–90.
-
- Lindenberg S. Social rationality, self-regulation, and well-being: the regulatory significance of needs, goals, and the self In: Wittek R, Snijders TAB, Nee V, editors. The handbook of rational choice social research. Redwood City, California, USA: Stanford University Press; (2020). 72–112.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources