Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 21;4(4):100543.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100543. eCollection 2025 Nov.

Intravenous iron reactions: Insights from an allergy and immunology perspective

Affiliations

Intravenous iron reactions: Insights from an allergy and immunology perspective

Jordon Jaggers et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis and management of intravenous iron reactions is often challenging, as skin testing has unproven utility and most reactions are non-IgE-mediated.

Objective: We aimed to identify clinical patterns and tolerability predictors in patients with reactions to intravenous iron.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with reactions to intravenous iron who were referred to the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Drug Allergy Clinic from April 2014 through January 2025 and administered a follow-up survey via RedCap to evaluate patient outcomes with future intravenous iron administration.

Results: Of the 51 patients presenting for adverse reactions to intravenous iron, 48 had skin testing performed. The skin testing results were deemed negative in all 48 cases (100%). Notable laboratory test results within 1 year of reaction were low vitamin D level (47%), high parathyroid hormone level (46%), and low phosphorus level (10%). Many patients (56%) were dermatographic, and their drug alert labels included opioids (31%), fluoroquinolones (14%), and radiocontrast dye (8%). Following assessment, 31 patients received intravenous iron (61%) using formulations that were the same as (n = 15 [48%]) and/or different from (n = 17 [55%]) the forumlation initially implicated, with the various modifications including antihistamines, slower infusion rate, and intravenous fluid pretreatment. Of these 31 patients, 27 (87%) tolerated the infusions. Additionally, following evaluation, the patients were surveyed regarding subsequent intravenous iron administrations, eliciting a 29% response rate (n = 15). Of the responders, 7 patients (47%) reported receiving intravenous iron after evaluation; all 7 reported tolerance.

Conclusion: Most reactions to intravenous iron are non-IgE-mediated; however, our study introduces 2 novel observations, namely, a high frequency of dermatographism (56%) and common colabeling of these patients with drug alerts to Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2)-activating drugs, suggesting a possible shared pathophysiologic mechanism.

Keywords: Adverse reactions; drug allergy; intravenous iron.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Supported by the 10.13039/100000133Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant R01HS03023401 [to C.S.]), the 10.13039/100000060National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant U01AI181927 [to C.S.]), a 10.13039/100007208Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center/Chic Awareness P3 Pilot Award that is unrelated to this article (to C.S.), the 10.13039/100019212AAAAI Foundation (to M.S.K.), the 10.13039/100000002National Institutes of Health (grant K08AI185260 [to M.S.K.] and grants R01HG010863, R01AI152183, and U01AI154659 [all to M.S.K.]), and the Australian 10.13039/501100000925National Health and Medical Research Council. In addition, E.P. receives grant funding as a principal investigator from the 10.13039/100000002US National Institutes of Health. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: E. Phillips has received funding from Janssen, Verve, Rapt, Servier, and Esperion, as well as royalties and consulting fees from UpToDate. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Broyles A.D., Banerji A., Barmettler S., Biggs C.M., Blumenthal K., Brennan P.J., et al. Practical guidance for the evaluation and management of drug hypersensitivity: specific drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8:S16–S116. - PubMed
    1. Solensky R., Phillips E.J. In: Middleton's allergy: principles and practice. 9th ed. Burks A.W., Holgate S.T., O’Hehir R.E., Bacharier L.B., Broide D.H., Hershey G.K.K., et al., editors. Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA: 2024. Drug allergy; pp. 1261–1282.
    1. National Center for Biotechnology Information Atomic Mass. PubChem periodic table. Bethesda, Md: National Library of Medicine (US) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ptable/atomic-mass/ Available at:
    1. Foer D., Wien M., Karlson E.W., Song W., Boyce J.A., Brennan P.J. Patient characteristics associated with reactions to Mrgprx2-activating drugs in an electronic health record-linked biobank. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11:492–499.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schaefer B., Tobiasch M., Wagner S., Glodny B., Tilg H., Wolf M., et al. Hypophosphatemia after intravenous iron therapy: comprehensive review of clinical findings and recommendations for management. Bone. 2022;154 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources