Efficacy and Safety of Firsekibart Compared to Etoricoxib for Gout Flares: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Active-controlled, Randomized Non-inferiority Trial
- PMID: 40833487
- DOI: 10.1007/s40744-025-00790-6
Efficacy and Safety of Firsekibart Compared to Etoricoxib for Gout Flares: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Active-controlled, Randomized Non-inferiority Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Firsekibart, an anti-interleukin (IL)-1β monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated more sustained control of gout flares compared with compound betamethasone in previous clinical studies. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of firsekibart versus etoricoxib for the treatment of frequent gout flares.
Methods: In this phase 2, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study (NCT05936268), adults with gout according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2015 criteria experiencing frequent flares (≥ 2 flares within 12 months pre-screening) were randomized (1:1) to receive either a single subcutaneous injection of firsekibart 200 mg, or once-daily oral etoricoxib 120 mg administered until pain remission or treatment intolerance for up to 8 days. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in target joint pain intensity (0-100 mm visual analogue scale [VAS]) 72 h post-treatment. Non-inferiority (margin: 10 mm) was assessed first; if achieved, superiority was subsequently evaluated. Safety was also evaluated.
Results: Overall, 123 patients received firsekibart (n = 61) or etoricoxib (n = 62). Firsekibart was non-inferior and superior to etoricoxib in change from baseline in target joint pain VAS scores at 72 h post-treatment (difference: - 10.91 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 18.11, - 3.72). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 77.0% (n = 47) and 51.6% (n = 32) of patients receiving firsekibart and etoricoxib, respectively. The most common TEAE in both groups was hypertriglyceridemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation or study withdrawal, and no treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) or deaths were reported.
Conclusions: Compared with etoricoxib, firsekibart provides superior target joint pain relief and is well-tolerated in patients with frequent gout flares.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05936268; date of registration: 7 July 2023.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Firsekibart; Gout flare; Interleukin-1β (IL-1β).
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Medical Writing/Editorial Assistance: Medical writing support was provided by Phoebe Kennedy, MSc, at Rude Health Consulting Ltd. This support was funded by Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Manuscript preparation assistance was provided by Huiwen Jiao from Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Ethical Approval: The study was conducted in accordance with international ethics guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki, and complied with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (Clinical Review No. 633, approved June 15, 2023), and from the institutional review boards of all participating centers (Supplementary Material, Table S1). All participants provided written informed consent before enrollment. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05936268). Conflict of Interest: Qian Xu, Tianhong Luo, and Xu Zhang are employees of Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Ning Kong, Yu Xue, Li Mao, Long Qian, Hongtao Guo, Jiankang Hu, Fenghong Yuan, Rongbin Li, Xinwang Duan, Jing Yu, Wei Gou, Lei Yang, Hua Wei, Rongping Li, and Hejian Zou have nothing to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Firsekibart, an Anti-interleukin-1β Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Chinese Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.Adv Ther. 2025 Sep;42(9):4611-4625. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03279-4. Epub 2025 Jul 25. Adv Ther. 2025. PMID: 40711661 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Firsekibart versus compound betamethasone in acute gout patients unsuitable for standard therapy: A randomized phase 3 trial.Innovation (Camb). 2025 Jul 5;6(8):101015. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101015. eCollection 2025 Aug 4. Innovation (Camb). 2025. PMID: 40814346 Free PMC article.
-
Interleukin-1 inhibitors for acute gout.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 1;2014(9):CD009993. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009993.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25177840 Free PMC article.
-
Colchicine for acute gout.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;(8):CD006190. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006190.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8:CD006190. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006190.pub3. PMID: 25123076 Updated.
-
Dietary supplements for chronic gout.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 7;(10):CD010156. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010156.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 12;11:CD010156. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010156.pub3. PMID: 25287939 Updated.
Cited by
-
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Firsekibart, an Anti-interleukin-1β Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Chinese Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.Adv Ther. 2025 Sep;42(9):4611-4625. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03279-4. Epub 2025 Jul 25. Adv Ther. 2025. PMID: 40711661 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Singh JA, Gaffo A. Gout epidemiology and comorbidities. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50(3, Supplement):S11–6. - PubMed
-
- GBD 2021 Gout Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of gout, 1990–2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024;6(8):e507–17.
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources