Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review
- PMID: 40835908
- PMCID: PMC12366218
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02931-w
Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review
Abstract
Background: Synchronous teleconsultations using video or phone have become an increasingly popular method for delivering healthcare, especially in primary care. This modality enhances access to care, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas, and was especially significant during disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these benefits, patient perspectives on teleconsultations with general practitioners (GPs) remain underexplored. Factors such as consultation type, convenience, and technology influence patient satisfaction and acceptance, but concerns persist about the effectiveness of remote consultations for complex cases. This systematic review explores patients' use, attitudes, experiences, satisfaction, and preferences regarding synchronous teleconsultations with GPs, aiming to identify factors influencing the choice of teleconsultation over face-to-face consultations.
Methods: The review included 46 studies published until March 2023, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library, following PRISMA guidelines. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies were analyzed, representing diverse contexts.
Results: Findings reveal that patient satisfaction with teleconsultation is influenced by consultation purpose, convenience, technological capabilities, and continuity of care. Video consultations are preferred over phone consultations, particularly for follow-ups and routine issues. Teleconsultation is seen as less effective for complex consultations requiring physical exams. Patient characteristics, including age, socioeconomic status, and technology familiarity, impact acceptance. Privacy concerns, data security, and diagnostic accuracy remain significant barriers. Continuity of care is better maintained when teleconsultation involves established patient-GP relationships.
Conclusions: The review emphasizes the need for hybrid care models and policies aligned with patient preferences, focusing on accessibility, technology, and privacy safeguards. Future research should address barriers for vulnerable populations and equitable access.
Keywords: Attitude; Experience; General practitioner; Patient; Preference; Satisfaction; Synchronous; Teleconsultation; Use.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Consolidated telemedicine implementation guide [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059184
-
- Teleconsultations during a pandemic - PAHO/WHO| Pan American Health Organization [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/documents/teleconsultations-during-pandemic
-
- Article R6316-1. - Code de la santé publique - Légifrance [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000022934375/201...
-
- England NHS. NHS England » Remote consulting [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/remote-consulting/
-
- Haute Autorité de Santé [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 16]. Téléconsultation et téléexpertise: guide de bonnes pratiques. Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_2971632/fr/teleconsultation-et-teleexper...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources