Baseline NIPE® index and heart rate variability in preterm infants: influence of maturity and clinical modulators
- PMID: 40836043
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-025-06408-x
Baseline NIPE® index and heart rate variability in preterm infants: influence of maturity and clinical modulators
Abstract
The NIPE® monitor estimates parasympathetic tone as a measure of infant pain through heart rate variability analysis. However, reference values and influencing factors remain unclear in preterm neonates. This study aimed to describe baseline NIPE values and their association with sex, gestational age (GA), and clinical conditions in this population. Prospective observational study conducted in a III-C level neonatal unit. Preterm neonates born before 32 weeks of GA were monitored using the NIPE device at four time points: birth (T1), day 7 (T7), day 15 (T15), and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (T36). Clinical and demographic data were collected. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse changes in mean NIPE values over time and their association with sex and GA. Fifty-three subjects were analysed. The expected mean NIPE value at T1 was 57.6 (95% CI [55.9,59.4]). No significant differences were found by sex (β = - 0.35, p = 0.85) or GA (β = 0.60, p = 0.11). A significant decrease was observed at T7 (β = - 2.40, p < 0.001) and T15 (β = - 3.60, p < 0.001), with partial recovery at T36 (β = - 0.20, p < 0.001). Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation showed lower NIPE values (β = - 1.33, p < 0.001). Sedative and/or analgesic treatment significantly reduced NIPE (β = - 2.92, p < 0.001). A significant increase in NIPE was observed in patients with abnormal cerebral ultrasound (β = 2.52, p < 0.001). Baseline NIPE values in a cohort of preterm newborns were close to the manufacturer's proposed comfort threshold (above 50) but may be influenced by specific clinical conditions. Further research is needed to establish reference values and define its utility across different clinical scenarios. What is known • The NIPE monitor assesses parasympathetic activity as a proxy for neonatal comfort, but its validation in preterm infants remains uncertain. • Heart rate variability is influenced by gestational age and other clinical conditions. What is new • Baseline NIPE values in preterm neonates are close to the comfort threshold of 50 established by the manufacturer. • NIPE threshold for defining comfort in preterm infants may need to be redefined according to postmenstrual age and adapted to the clinical context.
Keywords: Gender; Heart rate variability; NIPE; Newborns; Preterm neonates.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Gregorio Marañón Hospital (Code Pret-NIPE, 16/2020; date: June 22,2020), and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all participants included in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2(2):CD008435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28205208 Free PMC article.
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Cup feeding versus other forms of supplemental enteral feeding for newborn infants unable to fully breastfeed.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD005092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005092.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27577968 Free PMC article.
-
Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 23;(1):CD008435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2:CD008435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3. PMID: 24459000 Updated.
-
Does heart rate variability using the Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation index identify postsurgical pain levels and emergence delirium in toddlers? A prospective observational study.Can J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;71(8):1117-1125. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02764-8. Epub 2024 May 8. Can J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 38720113 English.
References
-
- Perry M, Tan Z, Chen J, Weidig T, Xu W, Cong XS (2018) Neonatal pain: perceptions and current practice. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 30(4):549–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CNC.2018.07.013 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Färnqvist K, Olsson E, Garratt A, Paraskevas T, Soll RF, Bruschettini M, Persad E (2025) Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000064.pub2
-
- Fortrat J (2022) Inaccurate normal values of heart rate variability spectral analysis in newborn infants. Am J Cardiol 90:346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02399-8
-
- Rosenstock EG, Cassuto Y, Zmora E (1999) Heart rate variability in the neonate and infant: analytical methods, physiological and clinical observations. Acta Paediatr 88:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035259950169422 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 17:354–381
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical