Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70401.
doi: 10.1111/hex.70401.

High Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on French Healthcare Workers: An Observational Cohort Study of PTSD, Depression and Burn-Out

Affiliations
Observational Study

High Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on French Healthcare Workers: An Observational Cohort Study of PTSD, Depression and Burn-Out

Wissam El-Hage et al. Health Expect. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: The Covid-19 outbreak hit the world forcing public institutions to rethink their core functioning. Healthcare workers (HCWs) were particularly at risk for negative mental health outcomes, given their direct exposure to many pandemic-related stressors. Our study aimed to assess the psychological outcomes of French HCWs during the Covid-19 pandemic, including PTSD, depression and burn-out.

Methods: This study presents the baseline data of a large cohort study conducted during the pandemic. Participants were 849 French HCWs (mostly single women, working as nurses) assessed for PTSD with the PCL-5 (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5), for depression with the PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire), and for burn-out and compassion satisfaction with the ProQOL (Professional Quality of Life). Other pandemic-related variables were also collected, including characteristics related to participants' Covid-19 experience, as well as psychological and clinical measures.

Results: The prevalence rates of PTSD, moderately severe depression, and high risk for burn-out were 17.7% (n = 146), 14.0% (n = 118) and 0.9% (n = 7), respectively. Further, findings suggested that working conditions were challenging, though they still found pride in their work. Univariate analyses showed that being a woman, not being a physician, and lacking protective equipment were each associated with higher scores on several negative psychological outcomes (PTSD, depression, burn-out and secondary traumatic stress), though not consistently across all dimensions. Notably, satisfaction scores on the ProQOL did not differ by gender and were higher among physicians. In the multivariate analyses, not being a physician was independently associated with higher levels of PTSD, depression and burn-out symptoms. Being a woman was independently associated with increased PTSD symptom severity. Higher levels of positivity-defined as a general tendency to view life and experiences with an optimistic and constructive outlook, as measured by the Positivity Scale-were associated with lower symptom scores across all three psychological outcomes.

Conclusion: This study highlights the considerable psychological toll of the Covid-19 pandemic on French HCWs, particularly among nurses and women, and underscores the protective role of individual psychological resources such as positivity. As one of the largest cohort studies conducted during the pandemic in France, it provides critical evidence to guide public health strategies, institutional policies and mental health interventions. The findings emphasise the urgent need to strengthen occupational mental health support systems and to promote resilience-building approaches among healthcare professionals facing prolonged crisis conditions.

Keywords: Covid‐19; PTSD; burn‐out; depression; healthcare workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.

References

    1. Pitlik S. D., “COVID‐19 Compared to Other Pandemic Diseases,” Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal 11, no. 3 (2020): e0027, 10.5041/RMMJ.10418. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang H., Paulson K. R., Pease S. A., et al., “Estimating Excess Mortality Due to the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Systematic Analysis of COVID‐19‐Related Mortality, 2020–21,” Lancet 399, no. 10334 (2022): 1513–1536, 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. French Public Health Agency . 2020. Chiffres clés et Évolution de la Covid‐19 en France et dans le Monde, https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/dossiers/coronavirus-covid-19/coronav....
    1. Ciotti É. and Borowczyk J.. 2020. Rapport d'information déposé en Application de l'article 145 du Règlement par la Mission d'information sur l'impact, la Gestion et les Conséquences dans Toutes ses Dimensions de l’épidémie de Coronavirus‐Covid 19.
    1. Or Z., Gandré C., Durand Zaleski I., and Steffen M., “France's Response to the Covid‐19 Pandemic: Between a Rock and a Hard Place,” Health Economics, Policy and Law 17, no. 1 (2022): 14–26, 10.1017/S1744133121000165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources