Preclinical and clinical evaluation of LY3451838, a PACAP-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 and phase 2 studies involving healthy adults and adults with treatment-resistant migraine
- PMID: 40836866
- DOI: 10.1177/03331024251368757
Preclinical and clinical evaluation of LY3451838, a PACAP-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 and phase 2 studies involving healthy adults and adults with treatment-resistant migraine
Abstract
AimLY3451838 is a monoclonal antibody against pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), a target in migraine research. The present study aimed to evaluate LY3451838 as a preventive treatment for participants with treatment-resistant migraine.MethodsFollowing preclinical assessment of LY3451838, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, safety was evaluated in a phase 1 study of LY3451838 (n = 33) versus placebo (n = 13) in healthy participants. A phase 2 trial was carried out in treatment-resistant participants with chronic migraine (CM) (n = 16) or episodic migraine (EM) (n = 22). In phase 2, participants received a single intravenous (IV) dose of 1500 mg LY3451838 (n = 19) or placebo (n = 19) and completed ePRO daily diaries. Participants were followed for safety for 140 days.ResultsIn phase 2, at one-month post-dose, patients who had received a single IV dose of LY3451838 exhibited greater changes from baseline than placebo in mean monthly migraine headache days in both the CM and EM subgroups (CM: -4.7 days vs. -3.0 days; EM: -1.7 days vs. -1.2 days), but the treatment contrast was not statistically significant in either subgroup. Similar non-significant results were seen at the three-month time point. The percentage of participants reporting treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for LY3451838 and placebo, with one serious adverse event of B-cell lymphoma in an LY3451838-treated participant that led to study discontinuation.ConclusionsLY3451838 did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo in patients with treatment-resistant CM or EM. However, the difference observed between LY3451838 and placebo among CM patients is similar to the statistically significant difference reported in the recent HOPE trial, which primarily consisted of CM patients. Further clinical research with larger sample sizes is needed to inform on the utility of blocking PACAP in various migraine populations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03692949 (phase 1); NCT04498910 (phase 2).
Keywords: PACAP; chronic migraine; episodic migraine; phase 1; phase 2; treatment-resistant migraine.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/orpublication of this article: Michael P. Johnson, Judith Krikke-Workel, Chetan N. Patel, S. Michelle Morin, P. Kellie Turner, Kristie A. Clark, Yan Jin, John R. Stille and Lisa M. Broad are employees and minor stake/shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. David Donley is a contractor at Eli Lilly and Company via EMB Statistical Solutions. Maurice Vincent and Kirk W. Johnson were employees and minor stake/shareholders of Eli Lilly during the time of the study but are not current employees. Dr Chetan N. Patel has received personal fees and clinical grants from Eli Lilly. Daniel Girard, Emma Raftis, Philiswa Mbandlwa and Dominika Kennedy are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. No other disclosures were reported.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical