Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30;28(9):113234.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113234. eCollection 2025 Sep 19.

Impact of 3D cell culture hydrogels derived from basement membrane extracts or nanofibrillar cellulose on CAR-T cell activation

Affiliations

Impact of 3D cell culture hydrogels derived from basement membrane extracts or nanofibrillar cellulose on CAR-T cell activation

Sonia Aristin Revilla et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Hydrogel-based 3D culture systems are increasingly used for preclinical evaluation of cell-based immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells. However, hydrogel properties can influence T cell behavior, potentially affecting interpretation of immunotherapy studies. We assessed CD4+ T and CAR-T cell responses in two chemically undefined matrices-Matrigel and basement membrane extract (BME)- and in a synthetic nanofibrillar cellulose (NFC) hydrogel. Although NFC was mechanically stiffer, T cell activation and proliferation were higher in NFC than in Matrigel or BME. Murine CD4+ T cells acquired a regulatory phenotype in Matrigel and BME but not in NFC. Similarly, CAR-T cell function was reduced in Matrigel and BME but maintained in NFC. These findings underscore how matrix composition can shape T cell responses in 3D culture. NFC provides a chemically defined alternative that preserves T cell activity, supporting its use in more accurate preclinical testing of immunotherapies.

Keywords: Biological sciences; Biomaterials; Cell biology; Immune response; Materials science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Rheological properties of NFC hydrogel, Matrigel, and BME (A) Rheological time and temperature sweep measurements displaying the crosslinking kinetics and behavior of NFC, Matrigel (MG), and BME, with a temperature ramp from 4°C to 37°C at 5°C per minute before stabilization. (B) Rheological frequency sweep measurements at 37°C, showing the frequency dependent viscoelastic behavior of NFC, Matrigel, and BME. (C) Rheological amplitude sweep at 37°C, showing the amplitude dependent viscoelastic behavior of NFC, Matrigel, and BME. (D) Storage modulus values derived from frequency sweep experiments at a 1 Hz frequency of NFC, MG, and BME. Data representative of three independent measurements are presented as means ± SD. Data were analyzed using unpaired one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (∗p < 0.05). NFC, nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel; MG, Matrigel; BME, basement membrane extract.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ECM-derived hydrogels (Matrigel and BME) influence murine CD4+ T cell activation, function and differentiation to regulatory T cells (A) Representative bright field images (EVOS microscope, scale bar 2000 μm) of CD4+ T cells purified from Foxp3eGFP mice stimulated ex vivo with anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/mL) in standard 2D suspension (control) or embedded in different hydrogels (NFC, Matrigel, and BME). CD4+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry after 5 days in culture. (B) Number of viable CD4+ T cells recovered after culture. (C) Median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of CD25 in CD4+ T cells. (D) Percentage of IFNγ-expressing CD4+ T cells. (E and F) Representative histograms showing CellTrace Violet expression on CD4+ T cells (E) and proportion of proliferative CD4+ T cells (f; CTV-low). (G and H) Percentage of Foxp3 eGFP+ CD25hi Treg cells (G) and representative histograms showing Foxp3 expression on Foxp3-eGFP+ Treg cells (H). Each point represents an individual mouse. Data from three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. Data were analyzed using unpaired one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). NFC, nanofibrillar cellulose; MG, Matrigel; BME, basement membrane extract.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ECM-derived hydrogels (Matrigel and BME) hamper human CD4+ T cell activation and function (A–H) CD4+ T cells isolated from cord blood mononuclear cells were stimulated ex vivo with anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/mL) for 5 days in standard 2D suspension (control) or embedded in NFC, Matrigel and BME. (A) Number of viable CD4+ T cells recovered after culture. (B and C) Median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of CD25 in CD4+ T cells (B) and representative histograms showing CD25 expression on CD4+ T cells (C). (D and E) Percentage of IFNγ-expressing CD4+ T cells (D) and representative histograms showing IFNγ expression on CD4+ T cells (E). (F and G) Representative histograms showing CellTrace Violet expression on CD4+ T cells (F) and proportion of proliferative CD4+ T cells (CTV-low; G). (H) Percentage of FOXP3+ CD25hi Treg cells. Each point represents an individual donor. Data from three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. Data were analyzed using unpaired one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). NFC, nanofibrillar cellulose; MG, Matrigel; BME, basement membrane extract.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CAR-T cell cytotoxicity in short term cultures is comparable between NFC, Matrigel, and BME CD20 CAR-T cells were co-cultured with Daudi (Burkitt lymphoma cell line) cells labeled with CellTrace Violet (CTV) for 24 h at the different effector to target (E:T) ratios specified, in standard 2D suspension (control) or embedded in the specified hydrogels. (A) Representative gating strategy for analyzing the viability of Daudi and CD20 CAR-T cells by flow cytometry. (B) Number of viable CAR-T cells recovered after culture in the 1:1 E:T condition (50,000 Daudi +50,000 CAR-T cells/well) as measured by flow cytometry using counting beads (Flow-Count fluorospheres). Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (C) Specific lysis (%) of Daudi cells induced by CD20 CAR-T cells at the specified E:T ratios. Specific apoptosis was calculated by applying the following formula: [(%viable untreated − %viable treated)/%viable untreated] × 100. (D and E) Bar plot showing median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of (D) IFNγ and (E) CD69 in CAR-T cells cultured for 24 h in the described conditions. Data from two or three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005). NFC, nanofibrillar cellulose; MG, Matrigel; BME, basement membrane extract.
Figure 5
Figure 5
ECM hydrogels (Matrigel and BME) reduce CAR-T cell activation and proliferation (A) Representative bright field images (scale bar, 1,000 μm) of CD20 CAR-T cells stimulated in vitro for 4 days with coated anti-CD3 (1.6 μg/mL) and soluble anti-CD28 (1 μg/mL) in either standard 2D suspension (control) or the indicated gels. (B and C) Number of viable CAR-T cells recovered after 4 (B) or 10 days (C) of culture as measured by flow cytometry using counting beads (Flow-Count fluorospheres). (D) Representative histograms showing CD25 expression in CAR-T cells. (E and F) median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD25 in CAR-T cells after 4 (E) or 10 days (F) of culture. (G–I) For flow cytometry-based analysis of proliferation, CD20 CAR-T cells were labeled with CellTrace Violet (CTV) dye on day 0 and stimulated as indicated in (A). (G) Representative histograms showing CTV expression on CAR-T cells and (H and I) proportion of proliferative CAR-T cells (low CTV expression) after (H) 4 or (I) 10 days of culture. (J and K) Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of (E) TIM3 and (F) HLADR in CAR-T cells after 10 days culture. Data from two or three independent experiments are presented as means ± SD. Data were analyzed using unpaired one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). NFC, nanofibrillar cellulose; MG, Matrigel; BME, basement membrane extract.

References

    1. Yuki K., Cheng N., Nakano M., Kuo C.J. Organoid models of tumor immunology. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:652–664. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.06.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Driehuis E., Kolders S., Spelier S., Lõhmussaar K., Willems S.M., Devriese L.A., de Bree R., de Ruiter E.J., Korving J., Begthel H., et al. Oral mucosal organoids as a potential platform for personalized cancer therapy. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:852–871. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1522. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vlachogiannis G., Hedayat S., Vatsiou A., Jamin Y., Fernández-Mateos J., Khan K., Lampis A., Eason K., Huntingford I., Burke R., et al. Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Science (1979) 2018;359:920–926. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2774. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeNardo D.G., Barreto J.B., Andreu P., Vasquez L., Tawfik D., Kolhatkar N., Coussens L.M. CD4+ T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dijkstra K.K., Cattaneo C.M., Weeber F., Chalabi M., van de Haar J., Fanchi L.F., Slagter M., van der Velden D.L., Kaing S., Kelderman S., et al. Generation of tumor-reactive T cells by co-culture of peripheral blood lymphocytes and tumor organoids. Cell. 2018;174:1586–1598.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources