Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 15:3:1077253.
doi: 10.3389/fddev.2023.1077253. eCollection 2023.

Roles of biomaterials in modulating the innate immune response in ocular therapy

Affiliations
Review

Roles of biomaterials in modulating the innate immune response in ocular therapy

Mehrnoosh Rafiei et al. Front Drug Deliv. .

Abstract

The eye is a hard-to-treat organ due to its poor regenerative capacity and susceptibility to inflammation; as a result, it has an immune privilege mechanism. In the case of ocular degenerative disorders, chronic and uncontrolled ocular inflammations can overcome this immune response to initiate and exacerbate tissue degeneration, ultimately leading to blindness. Recent landmark discoveries on the key roles of the ocular innate immune system in regulating acute and chronic inflammations as well as tissue fibrosis and homeostasis have shed light on the value of novel treatment interventions in modulating ocular immune responses at the molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. This strategy can be attained by using therapeutics to target resident phagocytes and antigen-presenting cells, namely, microglia and dendritic cells, as well as infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages. Biomaterials are foreign materials to the host and interact with innate immune cells. To leverage such intrinsic immunomodulatory properties, biomaterials such as implants, injectable depots, and nano/micro particles can be used alone as a treatment or with different payloads as carriers in immune-related ocular disorders. This article discusses how physicochemical properties such as biodegradability, size, shape, and charge affect biomaterials' interaction with the eye's innate immune system, therefore influencing outcomes towards pro- or anti-inflammatory responses. Knowledge about the eye's immunological response is required for designing tolerogenic biomaterials including intraocular lenses, cellular scaffolds, therapeutic molecule depots, or carriers of gene therapies. The discussion presented in this review will shed light on the potential use of biomaterials to direct immune responses toward favorable treatment outcomes.

Keywords: biomaterials; eye; immune-related disorders; immunomodulation; innate immune system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Immunomodulatory drug delivery systems for ocular innate immune cells immunotherapy. Biomaterials such as nanoparticles, microparticles, implants, eye drops, and injectable depots, with or without immunomodulatory cargoes, can be used to treat ocular diseases via different administration routes. Depending on the physiochemical properties, the biomaterials can promote or suppress the response from proinflammatory innate immune cells, which will in turn affect the therapeutic outcome (Created in BioRender.com).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Eye tissue and the key innate immune cells in the inflamed area. The pro-inflammatory innate immune cells, including N1 neutrophils (NTs), M1 macrophages/microglia (MΦ/MG), and immunogenic dendritic cells (DCs), with proinflammatory functions that are listed in the left window, can be re-educated by immunomodulatory biomaterials to anti-inflammatory cells, including N2 NTs, M2 MΦ/MG, and tolerogenic DCs, with anti-inflammatory functions that are listed in the right window (Created in BioRender.com).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Design parameters of implants and injectable depots for various ocular applications and key features for desired therapeutic outcomes (Created in BioRender.com).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The effect of different nanoparticle design parameters on immune system response. Nanoparticles’ size, shape, surface charge, and chemical structure can lead to immunogenic or immunosuppressive responses from innate immune cells (from top to bottom: neutrophils, macrophages, microglia, and dendritic cells) (Created in BioRender.com).

References

    1. Abu-Ain M. S., Webber S. K. (2010). The biological bandage contact lens: A novel technique for using the amniotic membrane in the treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects. Eye 24 (7), 1306–1307. 10.1038/eye.2010.1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adamson P., Wilde T., Dobrzynski E., Sychterz C., Polsky R., Kurali E., et al. (2016). Single ocular injection of a sustained-release anti-VEGF delivers 6months pharmacokinetics and efficacy in a primate laser CNV model. J. Control Release 244, 1–13. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.10.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn H., Kim J., Jeung E. B., Lee G. S. (2014). Dimethyl sulfoxide inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Immunobiology 219 (4), 315–322. 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.11.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allyn M. M., Luo R. H., Hellwarth E. B., Swindle-Reilly K. E. (2022). Considerations for polymers used in ocular drug delivery. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 8, 787644. 10.3389/fmed.2021.787644 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson J. M. (2003). Biological responses to materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 31, 81–110. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources