Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 5:16:1637299.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1637299. eCollection 2025.

Beyond the genome: the role of functional markers in contemporary plant breeding

Affiliations
Review

Beyond the genome: the role of functional markers in contemporary plant breeding

Tae-Chun Park et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Functional markers (FMs) are derived from polymorphisms that confer phenotypic trait variation, making them powerful tools in plant breeding. Unlike random markers, for which trait associations are unknown, or at best established via linkage or quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis, FMs are associated with causative polymorphisms, providing precise and reliable information for trait selection. Since the concept of FMs was first proposed in 2003, the emergence and adoption of technologies that were not available at the time have significantly advanced FM discovery and application by enhancing the ability to precisely identify causal variants underlying complex traits, which is a critical prerequisite for FM development. Novel technologies such as high-throughput sequencing, multi-omics, gene editing, and advanced computational tools have enabled the precise identification and functional validation of DNA polymorphisms associated with trait variation. FMs can be used in genomic selection (GS) and modern plant breeding programs by improving selection efficiency and accuracy. While FMs provide numerous benefits, challenges still remain regarding their stability and transferability, and innovative approaches to overcome these limitations are continually being explored. The role of FMs in plant breeding is expected to grow as functional annotation of genomes improves and technologies like genome editing become more accessible. These developments will enable breeders to effectively integrate FMs into breeding pipelines for accelerating genetic gains and addressing global agricultural challenges.

Keywords: functional markers (FMs); genomic selection (GS); polymorphism; random markers (RDMs); sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A timeline for the evolution of marker technologies and their integration into plant breeding from 1980s to the present.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The example of functional marker (FM) development process for Sub1A in Rice (Xu et al., 2006). This diagram outlines the development of a FM for Sub1A, a key gene conferring submergence tolerance in rice. The process began with QTL mapping and fine-mapping using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, leading to the identification of Sub1A. Gene expression analysis and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed its structure and differential expression. Quantitative trait polymorphism (QTP) identification revealed sequence variation between Sub1A-1 (tolerant) and Sub1A-2 (intolerant), followed by functional validation through RNA interference (RNAi) and overexpression studies. The FMs were then developed and applied in MAS, resulting in the Swarna-Sub1 variety with improved flooding tolerance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A schematic overview illustrating how forward and reverse genetic approaches link various phenotypic traits to genotypic information. Quantitative trait polymorphism (QTP) identification and validation concludes in Functional Marker (FM) application.

Similar articles

References

    1. Acevedo-Garcia J., Spencer D., Thieron H., Reinstädler A., Hammond-Kosack K., Phillips A. L., et al. (2017). mlo-based powdery mildew resistance in hexaploid bread wheat generated by a non-transgenic TILLING approach. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 367–378. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12631, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmar S., Saeed S., Khan M. H. U., Khan S. U., Mora-Poblete F., Kamran M., et al. (2020). A revolution toward gene-editing technology and its application to crop improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–28. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165665, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Amin N., Ahmad N., Wu N., Pu X., Ma T., Du Y., et al. (2019). CRISPR-Cas9 mediated targeted disruption of FAD2–2 microsomal omega-6 desaturase in soybean (Glycine max.L). BMC Biotechnol. 19, 9. doi: 10.1186/s12896-019-0501-2, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alemu A., Batista L., Singh P. K., Ceplitis A., Chawade A. (2023). Haplotype-tagged SNPs improve genomic prediction accuracy for Fusarium head blight resistance and yield-related traits in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 136, 92. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04352-8, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen J. R., Lübberstedt T. (2003). Functional markers in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.010, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources