Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 6:22:100302.
doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100302. eCollection 2025 Sep.

The influence of antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation on the microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery: A pilot study

Affiliations

The influence of antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation on the microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery: A pilot study

Undine Gabriele Lange et al. Surg Pract Sci. .

Abstract

Backround: The extent to which bowel preparation mechanical (MBP) or oral antibiotic (OA) or in combination (MBP/OA)) should be performed prior to elective colorectal surgery is the subject of ongoing debate. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of MPB/OA [with single-shot intravenous antibiotic administration before incision (MPB/OA+ivAB)] on the microbiome of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) operated minimally-invasive.

Methods: We were studying 16 consecutive patients who underwent elective resection surgery for CRC at our centre in a prospective panel study. MBP was performed and 1 g parmomomycin/500 mg metronidazole was administered orally one day preoperatively; 1 g ertapenem was administered intravenously 30 min prior incision. Three mucosal samples were taken preoperatively during colonoscopy and intraoperatively and analysed by 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing.

Results: Before MPB/OA+ivOA, the genera Phocaeicola (10 %), Bacteroides (7 %) and unclassified Ruminococcaceae (6 %) were predominant. After preparation, all bacteria were reduced except Enterococcus (7 %) and Escherichia/Shigella (6 %), which had increased. Significant reductions were seen for Bacteroides (p = 0.01), Haemophilus (p = 0.047), Holdemanella (p = 0.004), Neisseria (p = 0.004), Odoribacter (p = 0.027), unclassified Clostridiales (p = 0.008) and unclassified Ruminococcacaeae (p = 0.009). Large effect sizes (Cohens'd) were seen for Bacteroidetes (d = 0.864) and unclassified Ruminococcacaeae (d = 0.909).

Conclusions: In our pilot study, we observed a significant reduction in seven bacterial genera after MBP/OA+ivAB in patients with CRC. Some of these bacterial genera have been associated with anastomotic insufficiency. Further, large in-depth analyses are needed to evaluate perioperative microbial drift with postoperative complications.

Keywords: Bowel preparation; Colorectal surgery; Gut microbiome; Preoperative oral antibiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Alexander Link reports financial support was provided by German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Alexander Link reports was provided by European Regional Development Fund. Alexander Link reports financial support was provided by Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. Alexander Link reports financial support was provided by Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. Alexander Link reports financial support was provided by LUVO Medical Technologies Inc. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig 1:
Fig. 1
Mean distribution of abundant genera in mucosal samples before and after MBP/OA±ivOA Distribution of abundant genera in patient mucosal samples at the two time-points (PreSURG and SURG).
Fig 2:
Fig. 2
Boxplots of relative abundances PRESURG/SURG (a-g) Boxplots showing relative abundance of Bacteroides, Haemophilus, Holdemanella, Neisseria, Odoribacter, unclassified Clostriales and unclassified Ruminococcus at the time-points before (PreSURG) and during surgery (SUR) in mucosal samples.

References

    1. Definition after the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/index.html accessed on 10-23- accessed on 10-23-
    1. Sekirov I., Russell S.L., Antunes L.C., Finlay B.B. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(3):859–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009. JulPMID20664075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nichols R.L., Condon R.E., Gorbach S.L., Nyhus L.M. Efficacy of preoperative antimicrobial preparation of the bowel. Ann Surg. 1972;176(2):227–232. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197208000-00019. AugPMID4562009PMCIDPMC1355310. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schardey H.M., Kamps T., Rau H.G., Gatermann S., Baretton G., Schildberg F.W. Bacteria: a major pathogenic factor for anastomotic insufficiency. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38(11):2564–2567. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.11.2564. NovPMID7872748PMCIDPMC188242. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abis G.S.A., Stockmann H.B.A.C., Bonjer H.J., van Veenendaal N., van Doorn-Schepens M.L.M., Budding A.E., Wilschut J.A., van Egmond M., Oosterling S.J., SELECT trial study group Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial) Br J Surg. 2019;106(4):355–363. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11117. MarEpub 2019 Feb 25PMID30802304. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources