Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Nov 1;43(11):1832-1840.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117. Epub 2025 Aug 11.

Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in comparison to a population-based cohort: a propensity-matching approach

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in comparison to a population-based cohort: a propensity-matching approach

Victor J M Zeijen et al. J Hypertens. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term changes in risk of cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients treated with renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based cohort.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg. Patients treated with RDN were matched to hypertensive controls from the population-based Rotterdam Study using one-to-many variable-ratio propensity score matching. The primary safety outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, renal failure and mortality. The primary efficacy outcome was the 5-year change in office SBP.

Results: A total of 53 RDN patients were matched to 238 population-based controls. Median age [25th-75th percentile] was 60.5 [56.5-68.4] years (46% female). Baseline BP ±SD was 166.1/95.5 ± 20.6/10.9 mmHg. Patients were prescribed 2.8 [1.5-4.5] defined daily dosages of antihypertensive drugs. The incidence of the primary safety outcome was similar among the RDN group and the control group at 5 years [13 vs. 18%; hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-2.38; P = 0.87]. The 5-year change in SBP was -12.0 [-18.0, -6.0] mmHg in the RDN group ( P < 0.001) and -14.9 [-22.5 to -7.3] mmHg in the control group ( P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference [2.9 (-6.6 to 12.4) mmHg; P = 0.55].

Conclusion: Patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing RDN did not have a significantly lower risk for future adverse cardiovascular events as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based study. No difference in office BP was observed at 5 years. While real-world observational data could provide valuable insights, randomized trials are needed to confirm the role of RDN in improving long-term outcomes.

Keywords: blood pressure; cohort studies; glomerular filtration rate; hypertension; kidney; sympathectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.D. received institutional grant/research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, ACIST Medical, Medtronic, Pie Medical, and ReCor medical, and consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, ACIST medical, Boston Scientific, Cardialysis BV, CardiacBooster, Kaminari Medical, ReCor Medical, PulseCath, Pie Medical, Sanofi, Siemens Healthcare and Medtronic. All other authors declare no relevant interests to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study flowchart. 1A total of 2122 patients (5 RDN group, 2117 control group) were not eligible for participation in the current study (details provided in Supplementary Table 3). 2A total of 817 patients (37 RDN group, 780 control group) who did not complete the 5-year follow-up visit were excluded from the efficacy outcome analyses in the propensity-matched cohort. RDN, renal sympathetic denervation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Occurrence of the primary safety outcome (composite endpoint) in the matched sample. CI, confidence interval; RDN, renal sympathetic denervation. Cox proportional hazards models with cluster-robust standard errors were performed to adjust for data clustering within matched pairs. Matching weights were applied in all models to adjust for variable ratio matching. The P value was derived from the robust score test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Changes in blood pressure and prescribed antihypertensive drugs between baseline and 5 years in the matched sample. RDN, renal sympathetic denervation.

References

    1. Flint AC, Conell C, Ren X, Banki NM, Chan SL, Rao VA, et al. Effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:243–251. - PubMed
    1. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet 2014; 383:1899–1911. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet 2021; 397:1625–1636. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2016; 387:957–967. - PubMed
    1. Zeijen VJM, Lafeber M, Versmissen J, Kroon AA, Boersma E, Daemen J. Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: the DEGREE study. Int J Cardiol 2022; 352:137–143. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances