Personalized driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure in patients at risk of postoperative respiratory failure (IMPROVE-2): a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 40839096
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-025-08082-x
Personalized driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure in patients at risk of postoperative respiratory failure (IMPROVE-2): a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Purpose: Airway driving pressure has garnered considerable attention for lung-protective ventilation. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of airway driving pressure as a target to individualize positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting in mechanically ventilated patients at risk for postoperative respiratory failure.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, pragmatic, assessor-masked, randomized trial among adult patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery in 22 hospitals in France. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive individually adjusted highest PEEP targeting a driving pressure < 13 cmH2O after an initial recruitment maneuver (intervention group) or to a fixed PEEP level of 5 cmH2O (control group). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative respiratory failure (failure to wean from the ventilator or the composite of reintubation or curative non-invasive ventilation) or all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included components of the composite primary outcome.
Results: The primary outcome occurred in 87 out of 338 (25.7%) intervention patients and in 69 out of 341 (20.2%) control patients (difference, 5.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.8 to 11.8; relative risk, 1.27; 95%CI 0.96-1.68; p = 0.08). The difference was primarily due to an increased incidence of reintubation or need for curative non-invasive ventilation among intervention patients (difference, 7.1%; 95% CI 2.5-11.9; relative risk, 1.97; 95% CI 1.24-3.11; p = 0.004). Other secondary outcomes did not differ.
Conclusion: Among patients at risk for postoperative respiratory failure after emergency abdominal surgery, a strategy of individually adjusted highest PEEP in targeting driving pressure lower than 13 cmH2O did not reduce postoperative respiratory failure or death.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03987789.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Emergency surgery; Mechanical ventilation; Postoperative respiratory failure.
© 2025. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Ethics approval: The trial was approved for all centers by the French Committee for the Protection of Research Subjects (CPP Sud-Est III, number 2019-009B) prior to enrolment.
References
-
- Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J et al (2017) Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery: a multicenter study by the perioperative research network investigators. JAMA Surg 152:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS et al (2014) Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2:1007–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70228-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Portuondo JI, Itani KMF, Massarweh NN (2023) Association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after non-cardiac surgery among veterans. Ann Surg 277:e24–e32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004749 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X et al (2011) Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest 140:1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-0466 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C et al (2013) A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 369:428–437. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301082 - DOI - PubMed