Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 21;20(8):e0323740.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323740. eCollection 2025.

Investigating the role of FOX gene family in development and stress response in Labeo rohita: A multi-faceted analysis of phylogeny and genome characterization

Affiliations

Investigating the role of FOX gene family in development and stress response in Labeo rohita: A multi-faceted analysis of phylogeny and genome characterization

Saima Naz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The forkhead box (FOX) gene family of transcription factors regulates muscle development, immune responses, and metabolic processes across species. Despite extensive studies on FOX genes in other organisms, their evolutionary and functional roles in Labeo rohita, an economically and ecologically important freshwater fish, remain unclear. Owing to its unique physiological and ecological traits, L. rohita is an ideal model for exploring these roles. Here, we present the first computational analysis of the FOX gene family in L. rohita, identifying 21 FOX genes. Physicochemical analysis revealed that most FOX proteins have a basic nature except for FOX A3, D3, I2, O1, O3, O4, P1, and P2. Instability index analysis indicated that all FOX proteins are unstable (values > 40), while hydrophobicity assessment showed that except FOX O1, all proteins are hydrophobic. Phylogenetic analysis grouped FOX homologs into 11 major clades with other vertebrates. All proteins exhibited structural homogeneity by sharing the Forkhead Box domain. Gene structure comparisons revealed seven duplicated pairs, and Circos analysis demonstrated organization into 20 clusters. This study highlights the critical roles of FOX genes and fills a significant knowledge gap, providing a foundation for future functional and phylogenomic studies with implications for aquaculture and evolutionary biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Phylogenetic tree of the FOX gene superfamily based on 94 amino acid sequences from five species (L. rohita, O. niloticus, C. idella, D. rerio, and H. sapiens), clustering into 11 clades.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Structural Analysis of the FOX gene superfamily: (A) Phylogenetic tree, (B) Motifs, (C) Domains, and (D) Gene structure in L. rohita.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Syntenic relationships between FOX genes in L. rohita and H. sapiens.
The gray lines in the background depict collinear blocks in the genomes of L. rohita and H. sapiens, while the red lines emphasize the syntenic pairs of FOX genes.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Illustration of FOX superfamily gene localization and duplication events.
(A) The positions of FOX genes across all 12 chromosomes of L. rohita are shown, with mega-bases (Mb) used as the scale on the left. The corresponding chromosomal numbers are indicated at the center of each bar. (B) A Circos plot depicts the FOX genes in the L. rohita genome, highlighting gene duplication events. Duplicated regions are shown in proximity due to the arrangement of the chromosomes, with segmentally duplicated genes connected by a direct communication pathway.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Three-dimensional structure of the FOX gene superfamily in L. rohita generated using Phyre2.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Scan PROSITE identified intra-domain predictions.
This image represents all detected features and matches of the specified type. Pattern hits are displayed as thin colored bars without text, while hit profiles are represented as colored shapes accompanied by their corresponding PROSITE names.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jackson BC, Carpenter C, Nebert DW, Vasiliou V. Update of human and mouse forkhead box (FOX) gene families. Hum Genomics. 2010;4(5):345–52. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-4-5-345 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pascual-Carreras E, Herrera-Úbeda C, Rosselló M, Coronel-Córdoba P, Garcia-Fernàndez J, Saló E, et al. Analysis of Fox genes in Schmidtea mediterranea reveals new families and a conserved role of Smed-foxO in controlling cell death. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80627-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu W, Li M, Wang Y, Zhong C, Si X, Shi X, et al. Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis reveals the significance of forkhead box family members in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2023;15(1):92–107. doi: 10.18632/aging.204455 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magie CR, Pang K, Martindale MQ. Genomic inventory and expression of Sox and Fox genes in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis. Dev Genes Evol. 2005;215(12):618–30. doi: 10.1007/s00427-005-0022-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bach D-H, Long NP, Luu T-T-T, Anh NH, Kwon SW, Lee SK. The Dominant Role of Forkhead Box Proteins in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3279. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103279 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources