Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 15:477:123654.
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123654. Epub 2025 Aug 12.

Outcome measures in CIDP: A scoping and mapping review

Affiliations
Free article

Outcome measures in CIDP: A scoping and mapping review

Yusuf A Rajabally et al. J Neurol Sci. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: CIDP is a rare autoimmune disorder with varying symptom presentations. This heterogenous nature challenges standardizing disease monitoring and assessing treatment response. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) used in CIDP.

Methods: A structured literature review and mapping exercise was conducted to identify COAs reported in CIDP literature published between 2010 and 2023. Supplementary searches were conducted in other relevant sources. Key publications pre-2010 were identified through handsearching or consultation with clinical experts. Clinical experts assisted with prioritization of identified COAs to those clinically relevant to CIDP.

Results: Overall, 2027 records were included, with 904 prioritized for COA mapping, and 524 reporting on relevant CIDP COAs. Overall, 99 different COAs were captured; the most frequent related to functional impairment, followed by humanistic burden. Three COAs were most prominent: INCAT, MRC score and I-RODS (reported in 45.6 %, 37.4 % and 29.2 % of publications respectively). Numerous CIDP biomarkers were identified; 21 publications reported on neurofilament light chain (NfL).

Conclusion: Substantial heterogeneity in CIDP COAs use exists. This review identified the INCAT, I-RODS, and MRC score as core measures that evaluate important, although not exhaustive, aspects of CIDP disease experience. The absence of validated CIDP biomarkers, and the heterogeneity of available COAs, may impact the assessment of CIDP treatment effectiveness. More research is needed to establish a set of comprehensive outcome measures, that are relevant to clinicians and patients with CIDP.

Keywords: CIDP; Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; Clinical outcome assessment; Neurology; Outcome measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Y. A. Rajabally has received speaker/consultancy honoraria from LFB, Polyneuron, Argenx, Takeda, Janssen, Sanofi, Dianthus, Grifols, Vitaccess, has received educational sponsorships from LFB and CSL Behring and has obtained research grants from LFB. E. Nobile-Orazio has received speaker/consultancy honoraria from Argenx, Takeda, CSL Behring, Dianthus, Janssen, Kedrion, LFB, Roche and has received a research grant from Takeda. G. M. Boggia, C. Gary, and W. Noel are employees of Johnson and Johnson. D. Riley, S. Riley, and J. Peatman are employees of Adelphi Values PROVE which received funding from Johnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine to conduct the study.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources