Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Sep;10(9):105560.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105560. Epub 2025 Aug 20.

Durvalumab after radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for chemotherapy: the DUART phase II nonrandomized controlled study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Durvalumab after radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for chemotherapy: the DUART phase II nonrandomized controlled study

A R Filippi et al. ESMO Open. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Currently, patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ineligible for chemotherapy receive radiotherapy alone, with unsatisfactory results. DUART was a phase II single-arm trial of durvalumab in patients without progression after radiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Patients and methods: Patients were enrolled into parallel cohorts per radiotherapy dose (A: definitive; B: palliative) and received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks for up to 12 months). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 3/4 possibly related adverse events (PRAEs) within 6 months of durvalumab initiation. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory circulating tumor (ctDNA) analyses utilized a targeted methylation assay (GRAIL, Inc.).

Results: As of 06 December 2023, 102 patients received durvalumab (cohort A: 53; cohort B: 49); 18.8%/73.3%/7.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1/2 and median age was 79.0 years. Overall, 9.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8% to 17.3%] had grade 3/4 PRAEs within 6 months of durvalumab initiation. Median PFS (investigator assessed) was 9.2 months, with a 12-month landmark rate of 39.6%. Median OS was 21.1 months and the 12-month landmark rate was 64.7%. Patients who were ctDNA positive at cycle 1 or 7 had shorter PFS versus patients who were ctDNA negative at the same time point.

Conclusions: The safety profile of durvalumab after radiotherapy was consistent with PACIFIC (durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy). Efficacy across cohorts was encouraging. Some patients may achieve or maintain molecular remission with durvalumab even after palliative radiotherapy. Durvalumab following radiotherapy may be a potential treatment option in a frailer, older, chemotherapy-ineligible population.

Keywords: durvalumab; frail; non-small-cell lung cancer; radiotherapy; unresectable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure ARF reports receipt of honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, and Takeda; consulting fee(s) from AstraZeneca and Radiomics.bio; grants or research funds from AstraZeneca, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Radiomics.bio; and reports other potential financial relationships (e.g. holding a patent or receiving royalties, travel grants, lecture fees, etc.) with AstraZeneca and Elekta. MRGC reports receipt of honoraria and consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. JBP reports other potential financial relationships (e.g. holding a patent or receiving royalties, travel grants, lecture fees, etc.) with AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Ipsen, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMSi, and Amgen. DK reports receipt of honoraria and consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and BeiGene. CB reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Pfizer. PB reports receipt of consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Amgen, and Takeda; and grants or research funds from Roche. DC reports receipt of consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, Amgen, BeiGene, and Johnson & Johnson. AD reports receipt of consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Takeda, and Novartis; providing paid expert testimony for Bristol Myers Squibb; and receipt of travel grants from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda, and Pfizer. CG reports receipt of honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, and Takeda; and grants or research funds from the Italian Ministry of Health and FONICAP-LILT. RMM reports receipt of honoraria and consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pearl Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Teva. GT reports receipt of consulting fees from PharmaMar, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Molteni, and Novartis. FA reports other potential financial relationships (e.g. holding a patent or receiving royalties, travel grants, lecture fees, etc.) with AstraZeneca, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron, Takeda, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. GW reports consulting fees for work as a consultant statistician for AstraZeneca. ZZ reports employment with AstraZeneca and ownership of stock/shares in AstraZeneca and Pfizer. IDP and NG report employment with and ownership of stock/shares in AstraZeneca. KF reports receipt of consulting fees from AstraZeneca. RD reports participation in advisory council(s) or committee(s) for AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; receipt of consulting fees from OSE Immunotherapeutics; grants or research funds from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and AstraZeneca; and receipt of drug samples from Novartis and Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram (all enrolled patients). Participant disposition as of data cut-off 6 December 2023. Enrolled patients are those who provided written informed consent. Patients who completed 12-month study treatment are those who reached the maximum doses of durvalumab.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free survival and overall survival. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS and OS in (A, B) the safety analysis set, (C, D) cohort A (definitive radiotherapy), and (E, F) cohort B (palliative radiotherapy). PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of durvalumab to the first documented confirmed or unconfirmed disease progression or death (from any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of durvalumab discontinuation or receipt of another anticancer therapy before progression. Median follow-up duration for patients censored for PFS was 11.1 months (range <0.1-33.2 months) in the safety analysis set, 11.5 months (range <0.1-21.1 months) in cohort A, and 10.1 months (range <0.1-33.2 months) in cohort B. OS was defined as the time from the first dose of durvalumab to death from any cause. Median follow-up duration for patients censored for OS was 16.4 months (range 0.9-33.4 months) in the safety analysis set, 16.7 months (range 0.9-24.2 months) in cohort A, and 15.9 months (range 2.8-33.4 months) in cohort B. Tick marks indicate censored patients, and dashed lines indicate the landmark times. Some censoring may be obscured in the graphs if patients were censored around/at the same time point. Data cut-off 6 December 2023. CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculable; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RT, radiotherapy. aCalculated using the Kaplan–Meier technique; CI for medians based on the Brookmeyer–Crowley method; CI for landmark rates based on the Greenwood method.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Circulating tumour DNA analyses. ctDNA sample availability pre-dose at cycles 1, 2, and 7 of durvalumab (A). ctDNA dynamics among patients with evaluable samples at one or more time point (B, C). Kaplan‒Meier curves for PFS by ctDNA status at cycle 1 (D), cycle 2 (E), and cycle 7 (F). PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of durvalumab to the first documented confirmed or unconfirmed disease progression or death (from any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of durvalumab discontinuation or receipt of another anticancer therapy before progression. Tick marks indicate censored patients, and dashed lines indicate the landmark times. Some censoring may be obscured in the graphs if patients were censored around/at the same time point. Data cut-off 6 December 2023. C, cycle; CI, confidence interval; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat; NC, not calculable; neg, negative; PFS, progression-free survival; pos, positive; ppm, parts per million; RT, radiotherapy; TMeF, tumor methylated fraction. aCalculated using the Kaplan–Meier technique; CI for medians based on the Brookmeyer–Crowley method using log–log transformation; CI for landmark rates based on the Greenwood method using log–log transformation. The HR and associated CI was calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model, while the P value was determined by the log-rank test.

References

    1. Stewart R., Morrow M., Hammond S.A., et al. Identification and characterization of MEDI4736, an antagonistic anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(9):1052–1062. - PubMed
    1. Antonia S.J., Villegas A., Daniel D., et al. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1919–1929. - PubMed
    1. Antonia S.J., Villegas A., Daniel D., et al. Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2342–2350. - PubMed
    1. Hui R., Özgüroglu M., Villegas A., et al. Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (PACIFIC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(12):1670–1680. - PubMed
    1. Daly M.E., Singh N., Ismaila N., et al. Management of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(12):1356–1384. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances