Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 21:8:e64953.
doi: 10.2196/64953.

Implementing a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Implementing a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Qualitative Study

Cherish Boxall et al. JMIR Aging. .

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) in older adults can prevent, treat, or offset symptoms and deterioration from various health conditions and help maintain independence. However, most older adults are insufficiently active. Digital interventions have the potential for high reach at low cost.

Objective: This paper reports on the implementation of "Active Lives," a digital intervention developed specifically for older adults.

Methods: This study had a qualitative design. The implementation team approached a range of National Health Service, public health, community, and third-sector organizations in the United Kingdom to offer Active Lives to as large and diverse groups of older adults as possible. Alongside real-world implementation activities, research was conducted to explore what supports and inhibits the implementation of a digital intervention for PA in older adults. Data collection involved interviews with implementation partners (n=15) and the implementation team (n=3) plus extensive field notes from stakeholder communications. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results: Five broad themes were developed, capturing implementation barriers and facilitators. These were (1) complex and opaque networks and influencers, (2) forming an understanding of Active Lives and its fit, (3) a landscape of competition and conflicting interests, (4) navigating unclear approval processes, and (5) shifting strategies: small and effortful to high reach and passive. Identifying key decision makers proved arduous, consuming significant time and resources, and proposals from enthusiastic implementation partners often proved impractical or overly burdensome. Health care professionals demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits of digital interventions in alleviating operational burdens and improving patient care. However, stakeholders from disparate sectors held reservations about digital intervention and had different views on the best approaches to supporting PA among older adults. This discord was exacerbated by conflicts with existing local initiatives, such as group exercise programs, which occasionally hindered the implementation of Active Lives. Furthermore, bureaucratic hurdles within National Health Service trust approval processes acted as formidable obstacles, dampening progress and resolve, highlighting the need for guidance in identifying sustainable and scalable practices.

Conclusions: The findings highlight important implementation challenges to digital PA interventions for older adults such as bureaucratic barriers and alignment with ongoing initiatives. This research emphasizes the necessity for strategic direction and multilevel guidance to efficiently implement digital interventions for PA among community-dwelling older adults.

Keywords: aging; digital health; digital intervention; digital technology; exercising; implementation; mobile app; older adult; older people; physical activity; physical exercise; smartphone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: KB, SM, and JJ were involved in the development of the Active Lives website and were part of the implementation team in this study.

Similar articles

References

    1. Northey JM, Cherbuin N, Pumpa KL, Smee DJ, Rattray B. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;52(3):154–160. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096587. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauman A, Merom D, Bull FC, Buchner DM, Fiatarone Singh MA. Updating the evidence for physical activity: summative reviews of the epidemiological evidence, prevalence, and interventions to promote “Active Aging”. Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S268–80. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw031. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunningham C, O’ Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta‐analyses. Scandinavian Med Sci Sports. 2020 May;30(5):816–827. doi: 10.1111/sms.13616. doi. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kapteyn A, Banks J, Hamer M, et al. What they say and what they do: comparing physical activity across the USA, England and the Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Jun;72(6):471–476. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209703. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016 Sep;388(10051):1311–1324. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X. doi. - DOI - PubMed