Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Sep:160:107529.
doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2025.107529. Epub 2025 Aug 19.

Evaluation of non-invasive low-risk criteria in patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: A 12-months analysis from the INSPECTIO study

Affiliations
Free article
Observational Study

Evaluation of non-invasive low-risk criteria in patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: A 12-months analysis from the INSPECTIO study

Livio Giuliani et al. Vascul Pharmacol. 2025 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH) is a progressive, high-risk subtype of PAH characterized by immune-mediated vascular remodeling, poor treatment response, and reduced survival. Real-world data on therapeutic response and risk evolution in this population remain limited.

Methods: This post hoc analysis of the multicenter, prospective INSPECTIO study evaluated the CTD-PAH subpopulation treated with macitentan and/or selexipag. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of non-invasive low-risk criteria (World Health Organization functional class I-II, 6-min walk distance >440 m, BNP <50 ng/L or NT-proBNP <300 ng/L) from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints included changes in risk stratification, 6MWD, BNP/NT-proBNP levels, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, a comparison with the non-CTD PAH population of the study was also conducted.

Results: Among a total of 176 patients enrolled in the INSPECTIO study, 64 (36.4 %) had CTD-PAH. The CTD group, with a larger prevalence of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, was predominantly female (93.8 %) and older than the non-CTD group (66.4 vs. 59.6 years, p = 0.0005). The mean number of non-invasive low-risk criteria increased significantly from baseline to Month 12 (+0.20; p = 0.0389), with 10.9 % of CTD patients achieving three low-risk criteria at Month 12. Secondary endpoints (Investigator's risk assessment, 6MWD, BNP, NT-proBNP, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, baseline therapeutic strategy, vital signs) remained collectively stable.

Conclusions: CTD-PAH patients showed improvement in non-invasive risk criteria and stabilization of functional, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters under macitentan and/or selexipag therapy. Despite the observational nature and small sample size, this real-world analysis supports the use of risk-based treatment strategies and close monitoring in this patient population.

Keywords: Connective tissue disease; Macitentan; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Real-world evidence; Risk stratification; Selexipag.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest M.D. reported speaker bureau fees from AOP Health, Janssen and MSD; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AOP Health, Dompé and Janssen; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD. E.D.P. reported participation on an Advisory Board for Johnson & Johnson. L.D. reported consultancy fees from Abbvie, Alfasigma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Merk Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, and Vifor; speakers bureaus fees from Abbvie, Alfasigma, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis and Vifor; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbvie, Alfasigma, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis. F.G. reported speaker bureau fees and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyer-Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sanofi. A.D. reported consultancy fees from Biogen and Bristol Myers Squibb; speaker bureau fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly and Otsuka. R.B. reported consultancy fees from AOP Health, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, MSD and UT; speaker bureau fees from AOP Health, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, MSD, and UT. M.V. reported consultancy fees from Johnson & Johnson and Roche. E.A. reported speaker bureau fees and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Johnson & Johnson. C.M.L. reported speaker bureau fees from AstraZeneca, Bayern, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. F.B. reported support for attending meetings and/or travel from Dompé, Janssen, MSD; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD. M.B., A.U. and S.D.·S are full-time employees of Johnson & Johnson.

Publication types

MeSH terms