Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;39(10):6692-6701.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12020-9. Epub 2025 Aug 21.

Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey

Collaborators, Affiliations

Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey

Noa L E Aegerter et al. Surg Endosc. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has become the preferred minimally invasive approach for liver surgery. However, especially for complex RLS (C-RLS), key surgical steps such as preoperative preparation, intraoperative techniques, and training are often center-dependent and not standardized. The aim of this survey was to assess the international practice of key surgical steps during C-RLS among expert centers.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among robotic liver surgeons with a minimum individual experience of 50 RLS to assess their practice during C-RLS. The survey consisted of 50 questions, distributed across three sections: training, preoperative planning, and intraoperative practice for C-RLS.

Results: 60 out of 71 experts completed the survey, corresponding to an 85% response rate. 73% of the experts agreed that the IWATE difficulty score represents an adequate classification system to define C-RLS. A prerequisite before performing C-RLS was experience in complex open liver surgery (71%) and expertise in low and intermediate RLS (75%). Mentoring by a more experienced surgeon was deemed necessary by most experts (90%) when performing C-RLS. Vascular inflow control was mentioned to often be performed during parenchyma transection either selectively (38%) or routinely (52%). Most experts considered pre- or intraoperative positive staining helpful (57%), while negative staining (85%) was reported as even more important in C-RLS. For vasculo-biliary transection, experts preferred an intrafascial (45%), glissonian pedicle approach (33%) or a case-dependent transection (12%). For parenchymal transection, the preferred instruments were laparoscopic CUSA (92%), harmonic ACE (78%), and SynchroSeal (77%).

Conclusion: This expert survey reveals current international practices for preoperative preparation, training, and intraoperative key steps of C-RLS. Prospective validation of the key steps would be useful for correlating clinical outcomes with current practice.

Keywords: Complex robotic liver resection; Liver resection; Robotic liver surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Disclosure: Noa L.E. Aegerter, Christoph Kümmerli, Felix Nickel, Cristiano Guidetti, Christoph Tschuor, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Taiga Wakabayashi, Philipp Dutkowski, Adrian T. Billeter, Beat P. Müller, Philip C. Müller have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visual abstract of the survey on key steps of complex robotic liver surgery
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of participating countries, center-specific case load and expert experience

References

    1. Steinkraus KC, Traub B, Heger P et al (2024) Results of robotic liver surgery in association with IWATE criteria—the first 100 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 409:50. 10.1007/s00423-024-03239-6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P et al (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB 23:1467–1481. 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006 - PubMed
    1. Li Z, Pfister M, Raptis DA et al (2025) Novel benchmark for robotic liver resection—bridging tradition with innovation. Ann Surg. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006759 - PubMed
    1. Lok H-T, Lee K-F (2021) Robotic liver surgery: advantage beyond pure laparoscopic approach? Dig Med Res. 10.21037/dmr-21-69
    1. Birgin E, Heibel M, Hetjens S et al (2024) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver malignancies (ROC’N’ROLL): a single-centre, randomised, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100972 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources