Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey
- PMID: 40841593
- PMCID: PMC12500789
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-12020-9
Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey
Abstract
Background: Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has become the preferred minimally invasive approach for liver surgery. However, especially for complex RLS (C-RLS), key surgical steps such as preoperative preparation, intraoperative techniques, and training are often center-dependent and not standardized. The aim of this survey was to assess the international practice of key surgical steps during C-RLS among expert centers.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among robotic liver surgeons with a minimum individual experience of 50 RLS to assess their practice during C-RLS. The survey consisted of 50 questions, distributed across three sections: training, preoperative planning, and intraoperative practice for C-RLS.
Results: 60 out of 71 experts completed the survey, corresponding to an 85% response rate. 73% of the experts agreed that the IWATE difficulty score represents an adequate classification system to define C-RLS. A prerequisite before performing C-RLS was experience in complex open liver surgery (71%) and expertise in low and intermediate RLS (75%). Mentoring by a more experienced surgeon was deemed necessary by most experts (90%) when performing C-RLS. Vascular inflow control was mentioned to often be performed during parenchyma transection either selectively (38%) or routinely (52%). Most experts considered pre- or intraoperative positive staining helpful (57%), while negative staining (85%) was reported as even more important in C-RLS. For vasculo-biliary transection, experts preferred an intrafascial (45%), glissonian pedicle approach (33%) or a case-dependent transection (12%). For parenchymal transection, the preferred instruments were laparoscopic CUSA (92%), harmonic ACE (78%), and SynchroSeal (77%).
Conclusion: This expert survey reveals current international practices for preoperative preparation, training, and intraoperative key steps of C-RLS. Prospective validation of the key steps would be useful for correlating clinical outcomes with current practice.
Keywords: Complex robotic liver resection; Liver resection; Robotic liver surgery.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Disclosure: Noa L.E. Aegerter, Christoph Kümmerli, Felix Nickel, Cristiano Guidetti, Christoph Tschuor, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Taiga Wakabayashi, Philipp Dutkowski, Adrian T. Billeter, Beat P. Müller, Philip C. Müller have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P et al (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB 23:1467–1481. 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006 - PubMed
-
- Li Z, Pfister M, Raptis DA et al (2025) Novel benchmark for robotic liver resection—bridging tradition with innovation. Ann Surg. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006759 - PubMed
-
- Lok H-T, Lee K-F (2021) Robotic liver surgery: advantage beyond pure laparoscopic approach? Dig Med Res. 10.21037/dmr-21-69
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
