A Multicentric Analysis of a Pre-Ecographic Score in Pregnancy: Time for a Dedicated Classification System
- PMID: 40843698
- PMCID: PMC12371941
- DOI: 10.3390/epidemiologia6030039
A Multicentric Analysis of a Pre-Ecographic Score in Pregnancy: Time for a Dedicated Classification System
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives are to evaluate the influence of different maternal characteristics on ultrasound image quality and operator satisfaction, and to assess, preliminarily, a rating scale to stratify the difficulty level of ultrasound examination in early gestation. Methods: A multicentric observational study of ultrasound scans was carried out on singleton pregnant women undergoing routine gestational ultrasound at 11-14 weeks and 19-21 weeks of gestation at two Prenatal Care Centers in the Apulia region (Southern Italy). Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more limiting features, i.e., obesity, retroverted uterus, myomas, previous abdominal surgery, and limited echo-absorption. Each woman was given an overall pre-echographic limiting score from 0 to 9. The outcome measure was the operator's satisfaction with the examination, scored on a Likert scale. Nested linear regression models (raw, semi- and fully adjusted) were built for each of the two trimesters on the pre-ecographic limiting score (0-9 points) as dependent variables, with the operator's satisfaction as the regressor. Results: The whole sample included 445 pregnant women. The two-center samples did not show statistically different baseline features. The operator's satisfaction with the sonographic examination was significantly (and inversely) related to the pre-echographic limiting score, regardless of the mother's age, the operator performing the ultrasound, the Hospital Center where the ultrasound examination was performed, and the duration of the sonographic examination. Conclusions: A number of maternal conditions need to be monitored for good ultrasound performance; using a specific rating scale to stratify the level of difficulty of the ultrasound examination at early gestation could represent a potentially useful tool, although it requires further validation.
Keywords: anomaly ultrasound scan; imaging quality; maternal risk factors; pre-echographic score; pregnancy; ultrasonography.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- WHO . Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2016. - PubMed
-
- Goley S.M., Sakula-Barry S., Adofo-Ansong N., Isaaya Ntawunga L., Tekyiwa Botchway M., Kelly A.H., Wright N. Investigating the Use of Ultrasonography for the Antenatal Diagnosis of Structural Congenital Anomalies in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020;4:e000684. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000684. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Salomon L.J., Alfirevic Z., Berghella V., Bilardo C.M., Chalouhi G.E., Da Silva Costa F., Hernandez-Andrade E., Malinger G., Munoz H., Paladini D., et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): Performance of the Routine Mid-Trimester Fetal Ultrasound Scan. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;59:840–856. doi: 10.1002/uog.24888. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Benacerraf B.R., Minton K.K., Benson C.B., Bromley B.S., Coley B.D., Doubilet P.M., Lee W., Maslak S.H., Pellerito J.S., Perez J.J., et al. Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on Improving the Quality of Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;218:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.033. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources