Feasibility and safety of awake craniotomy in adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy
- PMID: 40844374
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.18617
Feasibility and safety of awake craniotomy in adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy
Abstract
Objective: Although awake craniotomy can guide functional brain mapping and resection, its feasibility and safety have been poorly studied in large series of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy surgery.
Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study of 588 consecutive awake craniotomies (2010-2024). Patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were compared to controls, with a focus on subgroup analysis of patients with low-grade, developmental, epilepsy-associated brain tumor and an associated nontumoral epileptogenic brain lesion group (46/558 patients, 8.2%), patients with ≥2 years of uncontrolled epileptic seizures (32/558 patients, 5.6%), and patients on ≥2 antiseizure medications (77/588 patients, 13.1%). Feasibility outcomes included time to awakening, intraoperative cooperation, and procedure abortion. Safety outcomes included surgery-related risks and intraoperative and early postoperative epileptic seizures.
Results: Compared to controls, patients with medically drug-resistant focal epilepsy (1) did not present higher rates of late awakening (6.5%-14.3% vs. 8.7%-9.8%, p = .450, p = .972, p = .143) or of insufficient intraoperative cooperation (0%-9.1% vs. 5.0%-6.1%, p = .019, p = .345, p = .173), (2) did not require abortion of the awake procedure because of epilepsy (0% vs. 0%, p = 1.0), (3) did not present a higher rate of intraoperative epileptic seizures (4.3%-9.1% vs. 2.7%-5.0%, p = .226, p = .529), (4) presented a higher rate of intraoperative epileptic seizures when presenting a ≥2-year history of uncontrolled epileptic seizures (12.9% vs. 2.3%, p < .001), and (5) did not exhibit a higher rate of early postoperative epileptic seizures (13.0%-19.3% vs. 9.8%-10.6%, p = .613, p = .143, p = .078). In multivariable analysis, drug-resistant focal epilepsy was not independently associated with time to awakening, intraoperative cooperation, procedure abortion, or occurrence of intraoperative or early postoperative epileptic seizures.
Significance: Awake craniotomy appears feasible and safe in patients with medically drug-resistant focal epilepsy, with similar and low rates of adverse events, including intraoperative epileptic seizures.
Keywords: awake surgery; drug‐resistant focal epilepsy; feasibility; safety.
© 2025 The Author(s). Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Elia A, Young JS, Simboli GA, Roux A, Moiraghi A, Trancart B, et al. A preoperative scoring system to predict function‐based resection limitation due to insufficient participation during awake surgery. Neurosurgery. 2023;93(3):678–690.
-
- De Witt Hamer PC, Robles SG, Zwinderman AH, Duffau H, Berger MS. Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome: a meta‐analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2559–2565.
-
- Pallud J, Rigaux‐Viode O, Corns R, Muto J, Lopez Lopez C, Mellerio C, et al. Direct electrical bipolar electrostimulation for functional cortical and subcortical cerebral mapping in awake craniotomy. Practical considerations. Neurochirurgie. 2017;63(3):164–174.
-
- Korkar GH, Isnard J, Montavont A, Catenoix H, Rheims S, Guénot M. Awake craniotomy for epilepsy surgery on eloquent speech areas: a single‐centre experience. Epileptic Disord. 2021;23(2):347–356.
-
- Vigren P, Eriksson M, Duffau H, Wretman A, Lindehammar H, Milos P, et al. Experiences of awake surgery in non‐tumoural epilepsy in eloquent localizations. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;199:106251.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
