Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Sep 2;67(9):ezaf284.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf284.

Repair Versus Replacement in Mitral Valve Papillary Muscle Rupture: A Multicenter Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Repair Versus Replacement in Mitral Valve Papillary Muscle Rupture: A Multicenter Study

Giulio Massimi et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: Papillary muscle rupture (PMR) is a rare but potentially fatal mechanical complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although surgery is considered the gold-standard treatment for post-AMI PMR, the optimal surgical strategy remains unclear.

Methods: Data from post-AMI PMR patients submitted to mitral valve replacement (MVR) or mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery in the period between 2001 and 2019, from 20 international centres, were collected in the CAUTION study database. In-hospital and long-term post-discharge mortality were the endpoints. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine mortality independent factors.

Results: The patient cohort available included 218 patients. MVR was the most frequent type of surgery (81.6%). Complete PMR was more common in the MVR group (71.9%, P = .008), while partial PMR was more frequent in MVr patients (75%, P = .008). In-hospital mortality rate was 25.8% in the MVR subgroup and 20% in MVr subjects (P = .440). In MVR subgroup, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (n = 20/96, 21%) than no concomitant CABG (31.7%, P = .035). Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 59.3%, 55.9%, 53.1%, 46.9% in the MVR group and 59.9%, 56.8%, 54.1%, and 43.2% in MVr patients, respectively, with no statistical differences (P = .474). Patients underwent MVr surgery, and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 79.8%, 75.4%, 68.5%, and 37.5%, respectively, when CABG revascularization was performed, while no CABG survival was 16.7%, 16.7%, 8.3%, and 8.3% (P < .001).

Conclusions: MVR is the most commonly performed in complete post-AMI PMR and MVr in partial PMR. No differences were observed regarding in-hospital and long-term mortality in the 2 surgical groups, and no independent factors were associated with overall mortality. Concomitant CABG was associated with higher in-hospital survival.

Clinical registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03848429.

Keywords: mitral valve; mitral valve repair; mitral valve replacement; myocardial infarction; papillary muscle rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.L. is a consultant for Medtronic and LivaNova and a member of the Advisory Board of Eurosets and PulseCath.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Postoperative Outcomes in MVR and MVr in Post-AMI PMR Populations. Abbreviations: AMI = acute myocardial infarction; MVR = mitral valve replacement; MVr = mitral valve repair; PMR = papillary muscle rupture
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier Curves of Survival for MVR and MVr in Post-AMI PMR Population. Abbreviations: AMI = acute myocardial infarction; MVR = mitral valve replacement; MVr = mitral valve repair; PMR = papillary muscle rupture
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier Curves of Survival for Post-AMI Patients Who Underwent MVR With and Without Concomitant CABG Revascularization. AMI = acute myocardial infarction; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; MVR = mitral valve replacement
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier Curves of Survival for Post-AMI Patients Who Underwent MVr With and Without Concomitant CABG Revascularization. Abbreviations: AMI = acute myocardial infarction; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; MVr = mitral valve repair

References

    1. Elbadawi A, Elgendy IY, Mahmoud K, et al. Temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1825-1836. - PubMed
    1. Massimi G, Matteucci M, De Bonis M, et al. Extracorporeal life support in mitral papillary muscle rupture: outcome of multicenter study. Artif Organs. 2023;47:1386-1394. 10.1111/aor.14541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Massimi G, Matteucci M, Kowalewski M, et al. Operative strategies for acute mitral regurgitation as a mechanical complication of myocardial infarction. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;11:328-336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouma W, Wijdh-den Hamer IJ, Klinkenberg TJ, et al. Mitral valve repair for post myocardial infarction papillary muscle rupture. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:1063-1069. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fasol R, Lakew F, Wetter S. Mitral repair in patients with a ruptured papillary muscle. Am Heart J. 2000;139:549-554. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data