Does the thoracic fluid content reflect lung water and cardiac preload?
- PMID: 40848214
- PMCID: PMC12474671
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-025-01335-6
Does the thoracic fluid content reflect lung water and cardiac preload?
Abstract
Whether the thoracic fluid content (TFC) estimated by bioimpedance actually reflects the thoracic water content and tracks its changes has not been tested yet. We compared TFC changes induced by volume expansion with those of well-established markers of cardiac preload including the global end-diastolic volume indexed (GEDVI) estimated by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) and central venous pressure (CVP). We assessed the relationship between TFC and extravascular lung water indexed (EVLWI) estimated by TPTD in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In 42 patients with a TPTD device (PiCCO2), we measured GEDVI, EVLWI and CVP before and after a 500-mL fluid bolus (Fluid group). In 23 different patients with ARDS, we measured the day-to-day changes in TFC and EVLWI (ARDS group). In the Fluid group (42 measurements), TFC increased significantly during fluid infusion. There was no correlation between the fluid-induced changes in GEDVI or CVP and the fluid-induced changes in TFC (p = 0.71 and p = 0.09, respectively). In the ARDS group, 124 measurements were performed, representing 101 changes between timepoints. There was no correlation between the percent changes in GEDVI, EVLWI, the sum of GEDVI + EVLWI and the percent changes in TFC (p = 0.52, 0.40 and 0.55, respectively). Considering all 208 measurements performed, absolute values of EVLWI were correlated with absolute values of TFC (r = 0.21, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the absolute values of GEDVI and the sum of GEDVI + EVLWI and those of TFC (p = 0.33 and 0.39, respectively). Still considering all measurements performed, the percentage of error of cardiac index measured by bioreactance compared to TPTD was 131%. In critically ill patients, TFC measured by bioimpedance does not follow the changes induced by a fluid bolus of well-known markers of cardiac preload. It also does not follow the changes in EVLWI observed in patients with ARDS. While absolute values of TFC are weakly correlated with those of EVLWI, it is determined neither by GEDVI, nor by the sum of both.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10877-025-01335-6.
Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Biompedance; Cardiac preload; Extravascular lung water; Hemodynamic monitoring; Thoracic fluid content; Transpulmonary thermodilution; Volume expansion.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: X.M. and JL.T. are members of the Medical Advisory Board of Pulsion Medical Systems. X.M. received fees for lecture for Baxter Healthcare. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Funding: None.
Figures
References
-
- Couture EJ, Laferrière-Langlois P, Denault A. New developments in continuous hemodynamic monitoring of the critically ill patient. Can J Cardiol. 2023;39(4):432–43. 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 18. PMID: 36669685. - PubMed
-
- Saugel B, Cecconi M, Hajjar LA. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in cardiothoracic surgery patients: available methods and future directions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(6):1742–52. 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 27. PMID: 30318422. - PubMed
-
- ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-33. 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. PMID: 22797452. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
