Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;39(5):1027-1035.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01335-6. Epub 2025 Aug 23.

Does the thoracic fluid content reflect lung water and cardiac preload?

Affiliations

Does the thoracic fluid content reflect lung water and cardiac preload?

Daniela Rosalba et al. J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Whether the thoracic fluid content (TFC) estimated by bioimpedance actually reflects the thoracic water content and tracks its changes has not been tested yet. We compared TFC changes induced by volume expansion with those of well-established markers of cardiac preload including the global end-diastolic volume indexed (GEDVI) estimated by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) and central venous pressure (CVP). We assessed the relationship between TFC and extravascular lung water indexed (EVLWI) estimated by TPTD in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In 42 patients with a TPTD device (PiCCO2), we measured GEDVI, EVLWI and CVP before and after a 500-mL fluid bolus (Fluid group). In 23 different patients with ARDS, we measured the day-to-day changes in TFC and EVLWI (ARDS group). In the Fluid group (42 measurements), TFC increased significantly during fluid infusion. There was no correlation between the fluid-induced changes in GEDVI or CVP and the fluid-induced changes in TFC (p = 0.71 and p = 0.09, respectively). In the ARDS group, 124 measurements were performed, representing 101 changes between timepoints. There was no correlation between the percent changes in GEDVI, EVLWI, the sum of GEDVI + EVLWI and the percent changes in TFC (p = 0.52, 0.40 and 0.55, respectively). Considering all 208 measurements performed, absolute values of EVLWI were correlated with absolute values of TFC (r = 0.21, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the absolute values of GEDVI and the sum of GEDVI + EVLWI and those of TFC (p = 0.33 and 0.39, respectively). Still considering all measurements performed, the percentage of error of cardiac index measured by bioreactance compared to TPTD was 131%. In critically ill patients, TFC measured by bioimpedance does not follow the changes induced by a fluid bolus of well-known markers of cardiac preload. It also does not follow the changes in EVLWI observed in patients with ARDS. While absolute values of TFC are weakly correlated with those of EVLWI, it is determined neither by GEDVI, nor by the sum of both.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10877-025-01335-6.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Biompedance; Cardiac preload; Extravascular lung water; Hemodynamic monitoring; Thoracic fluid content; Transpulmonary thermodilution; Volume expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: X.M. and JL.T. are members of the Medical Advisory Board of Pulsion Medical Systems. X.M. received fees for lecture for Baxter Healthcare. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Funding: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation between the changes in thoracic fluid content (TFC) and in global end-diastolic volume indexed (GEDVI) induced by fluid infusion in the Fluid group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation between the absolute values of thoracic fluid content (TFC) and the sum of global end-diastolic volume indexed (GEDVI) and extravascular lung water indexed (EVLWI) considering all measurements performed in the study. Patients of the Fluid group: dark blue (n = 84), patients of the EVLW group: light blue (n = 124). The dotted line indicates the regression line. N = 208, p = 0.39

References

    1. Couture EJ, Laferrière-Langlois P, Denault A. New developments in continuous hemodynamic monitoring of the critically ill patient. Can J Cardiol. 2023;39(4):432–43. 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 18. PMID: 36669685. - PubMed
    1. Saugel B, Cecconi M, Hajjar LA. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in cardiothoracic surgery patients: available methods and future directions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(6):1742–52. 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 27. PMID: 30318422. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen LS, Squara P. Non-Invasive monitoring of cardiac output in critical care medicine. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:200. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00200. PMID: 29230392; PMCID: PMC5715400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-33. 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. PMID: 22797452. - PubMed
    1. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):147. 10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5. PMID: 28625165; PMCID: PMC5474867. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources