Comparison between barbed and non-barbed sutures for fascial closure in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40849594
- DOI: 10.1007/s00595-025-03118-7
Comparison between barbed and non-barbed sutures for fascial closure in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of barbed and non-barbed sutures for fascial closure in abdominal surgery.
Methods: A systematic literature search through February 2025 identified studies comparing overall surgical site infections (SSI), fascial complications, and hospital stays between barbed and non-barbed sutures. A meta-analysis using random-effects models calculated odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Seven studies involving 12,278 patients (barbed group, n = 4912; non-barbed group, n = 7366) were included. The overall SSI rates were 1.9% and 4.0% in the barbed and non-barbed groups, respectively. Barbed sutures significantly reduced overall SSIs (OR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.53; P < 0.001) without statistical heterogeneity. Barbed suture also significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (MD, - 1.13; 95% CI: - 1.42- - 0.83, P < 0.001) without statistical heterogeneity. No significant difference was observed in fascial complications between the groups (OR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.36-1.22, P = 0.19).
Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to focus specifically on barbed sutures for abdominal fascial closure. Barbed sutures significantly reduce SSI and hospital stay without increasing fascial complications, thus suggesting that they are safe and efficient options for abdominal wall closure.
Keywords: Abdominal surgery; Barbed suture; Fascial closure; Meta-analysis; Surgical site infection.
© 2025. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article. Ethics approval Not applicable. Registry and registration number: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered with the UMIN-CTR (ID: UMIN000057754). Patient consent: Not applicable.
Similar articles
-
Is barbed better? Evaluation of triclosan-coated barbed suture on wound complications following emergency laparotomy.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jul 1;97(1):149-157. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004341. Epub 2024 Apr 10. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024. PMID: 38595220
-
Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24526375 Free PMC article.
-
Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29083473 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of V-Loc™ barbed sutures versus conventional suture techniques in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1249-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07291-3. Epub 2023 Dec 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38127141 Free PMC article.
-
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29099149 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zucker BE, Simillis C, Tekkis P, Kontovounisios C. Suture choice to reduce occurrence of surgical site infection, hernia, wound dehiscence and sinus/fistula: a network meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101:150–61. - PubMed
-
- Harada T, Numata M, Atsumi Y, Fukuda T, Izukawa S, Suwa Y, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices. Surg Today. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02988-7 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Matsuda A, Yamada T, Ohta R, Sonoda H, Shinji S, Iwai T, et al. Surgical site infections in gastroenterological surgery. J Nippon Med Sch. 2023;90:2–10. - PubMed
-
- Yamada T, Matsuda A, Nishino T, Uehara K, Hagiwara N, Sakurazawa N, et al. Impact of extended prophylactic antibiotic administration on surgical site infections: a multicenter real-world data study. Surg Today. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03101-2 . - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous