Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 23.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03118-7. Online ahead of print.

Comparison between barbed and non-barbed sutures for fascial closure in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Comparison between barbed and non-barbed sutures for fascial closure in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Akihisa Matsuda et al. Surg Today. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of barbed and non-barbed sutures for fascial closure in abdominal surgery.

Methods: A systematic literature search through February 2025 identified studies comparing overall surgical site infections (SSI), fascial complications, and hospital stays between barbed and non-barbed sutures. A meta-analysis using random-effects models calculated odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Seven studies involving 12,278 patients (barbed group, n = 4912; non-barbed group, n = 7366) were included. The overall SSI rates were 1.9% and 4.0% in the barbed and non-barbed groups, respectively. Barbed sutures significantly reduced overall SSIs (OR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.53; P < 0.001) without statistical heterogeneity. Barbed suture also significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (MD, - 1.13; 95% CI: - 1.42- - 0.83, P < 0.001) without statistical heterogeneity. No significant difference was observed in fascial complications between the groups (OR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.36-1.22, P = 0.19).

Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to focus specifically on barbed sutures for abdominal fascial closure. Barbed sutures significantly reduce SSI and hospital stay without increasing fascial complications, thus suggesting that they are safe and efficient options for abdominal wall closure.

Keywords: Abdominal surgery; Barbed suture; Fascial closure; Meta-analysis; Surgical site infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article. Ethics approval Not applicable. Registry and registration number: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered with the UMIN-CTR (ID: UMIN000057754). Patient consent: Not applicable.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zucker BE, Simillis C, Tekkis P, Kontovounisios C. Suture choice to reduce occurrence of surgical site infection, hernia, wound dehiscence and sinus/fistula: a network meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101:150–61. - PubMed
    1. Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer JP, et al. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg. 2022;109:1239–50. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Harada T, Numata M, Atsumi Y, Fukuda T, Izukawa S, Suwa Y, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices. Surg Today. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02988-7 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matsuda A, Yamada T, Ohta R, Sonoda H, Shinji S, Iwai T, et al. Surgical site infections in gastroenterological surgery. J Nippon Med Sch. 2023;90:2–10. - PubMed
    1. Yamada T, Matsuda A, Nishino T, Uehara K, Hagiwara N, Sakurazawa N, et al. Impact of extended prophylactic antibiotic administration on surgical site infections: a multicenter real-world data study. Surg Today. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03101-2 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources