The clinical impact of 16S ribosomal RNA PCR and sequencing in the identification of bacterial infections: a 7-year report from a Lebanese tertiary care center
- PMID: 40851799
- PMCID: PMC12367777
- DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1619640
The clinical impact of 16S ribosomal RNA PCR and sequencing in the identification of bacterial infections: a 7-year report from a Lebanese tertiary care center
Abstract
Introduction: The identification of bacterial pathogens in the clinical setting is essential for providing optimal care and improving outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to assess the performance of the 16S test in bacterial identification from different samples and determine its impact on clinical outcomes.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of patient samples collected from all age-groups at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), from May 2016 to December 2022. Descriptive statistics were conducted to calculate the 16S test positivity rate and to describe the different types of organisms. Univariate analyses were performed to study the clinical impact of the 16S test and its comparison to the conventional bacterial culture among different characteristics. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 1489 specimens were submitted for the 16S test during the study period. Of the submitted tests, 395 (26%) had bacteria identified by the 16S test and/or culture. Out of the culture negative/16S positive group, the majority were from specimens collected from the skin and soft tissue system (24 out of 92, 26.1%). This was followed by musculoskeletal specimens (15 out of 92, 16.3%), and central nervous system specimens (14 out of 92, 15.2%). Pus samples had a positivity rate of 66.3% with 5 times higher odds of being positive compared to non-pus samples (25%). Overall, there were 260 identified organisms by 16S test of which the most detected organisms were Staphylococcus spp, Streptococcus spp. and Enterobacterales. The results revealed that 16S testing impacted management in 45.9% of the cases (83/181) showing a change in management. Antibiotic escalation was applied in 31.3% of cases (26/83). Antibiotic de-escalation occurred in 41% of cases (34/83). A change in the treating diagnosis was noted in 26.5% of cases (22/83).
Conclusion: Identification of pathogens using the 16S test in combination with conventional cultures is essential in clinical diagnostics and management of infectious diseases to provide targeted therapy and improve antimicrobial stewardship. Shorter turnaround time, improved patient management, and cost-effectiveness are key factors to consider when advocating for the broader adoption of 16S testing.
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Lebanon; antimicrobial management; bacterial infection; clinical impact; clinical specimens; conventional culture; diagnostic yield.
Copyright © 2025 Youssef, Boutros, Dakroub, Akl, Reslan, Finianos, Moumneh, Dargham, Zein, Haddara, Korman, Khafaja, Matar, Araj and Dbaibo.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
References
-
- Aggarwal D., Kanitkar T., Narouz M., Azadian B. S., Moore L. S. P., Mughal N. (2020). Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of bacterial 16S rRNA and targeted PCR based diagnostic testing in a UK microbiology laboratory network. Sci. Rep. 10, 7965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64739-1, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
