Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 19:23971983251340559.
doi: 10.1177/23971983251340559. Online ahead of print.

Treatment recommendations for the systemic pharmacological treatment of systemic sclerosis digital ulcers: Results from the World Scleroderma Foundation Ad Hoc Committee

Affiliations

Treatment recommendations for the systemic pharmacological treatment of systemic sclerosis digital ulcers: Results from the World Scleroderma Foundation Ad Hoc Committee

Nancy Maltez et al. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. .

Abstract

Introduction: Digital ulcers are an important disease manifestation of systemic sclerosis and are associated with significant morbidity. As such, there is an urgent need for the development of evidence-based recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of digital ulcers.

Methods: A steering committee of international experts was established. A systematic review of the literature pertaining to the use of pharmacologic treatments in the management of digital ulcers was performed to inform the development of treatment recommendations for systemic sclerosis digital ulcers. Consensus methodology was used to develop the final treatment recommendations.

Results: The World Scleroderma Foundation committee agreed on 8 overarching treatment principles and 10 pharmacologic treatment recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis digital ulcers. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and intravenous iloprost were recommended for the management of acute digital ulcers. Bosentan was recommended for prevention of digital ulcers.

Conclusion: This study has yielded pragmatic treatment recommendations to direct treatment decisions for the management of systemic sclerosis digital ulcers. In addition, results have highlighted areas in need of future research in order to improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis; consensus; digital ulcer; recommendations; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: M.H. reports research funding and speaker fees from Janssen, outside of the submitted work. Chair of a Data Safety Monitoring Board: SHED SSc – SHarp dEbridement of Digital ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: a multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial feasibility study (REC reference: 21/YH/0278). M.K. has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or research grants from Argenx, Asahi Kasei Parma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, GSK, Janssen, Kissei, MBL, Mochida, Ono Pharmaceuticals and Tanabe-Mitsubishi. L.C. has received consulting fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Genentech, Kyverna, IgM Biosciences, Lilly and Janssen. D.G. has received speaking fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen. O.D. has/had consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from and/or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications in the last three calendar years: 4P-Pharma, Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Altavant, Amgen, AnaMar, Argenx, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cantargia AB, Catalyze Capital, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galderma, Galapagos, Glenmark, Gossamer, Horizon, Janssen, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nkarta Inc., Novartis, Orion, Prometheus, Redxpharma, Roivant, EMD Serono, Topadur and UCB. Patent issued ‘mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis’ (US8247389, EP2331143). Co-founder of CITUS AG. None of the other authors report any relevant conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hughes M, Herrick AL. Systemic sclerosis. Br J Hosp Med 2019; 80(9): 530–536. - PubMed
    1. Matucci-Cerinic M, Krieg T, Guillevin L, et al. Elucidating the burden of recurrent and chronic digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: long-term results from the DUO Registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75(10): 1770–1776. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughes M, Allanore Y, Chung L, et al. Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 16(4): 208–221. - PubMed
    1. Mihai C, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, et al. Digital ulcers predict a worse disease course in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75(4): 681–686. - PubMed
    1. Morrisroe K, Stevens W, Sahhar J, et al. Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: their epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and associated clinical and economic burden. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21(1): 299. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources