Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 7:15:1561256.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1561256. eCollection 2025.

Evaluation of Ki-67 expression levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using dual-energy CT quantitative parameters

Affiliations

Evaluation of Ki-67 expression levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using dual-energy CT quantitative parameters

Jing Sun et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Aim: This study investigates the use of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) quantitative parameters to assess Ki-67 expression levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: A total of 57 ESCC patients who underwent dual-phase DECT scans were included. Key parameters measured were iodine concentration (IC), water concentration (WC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), spectral Hounsfield unit curve slope (λHu), and effective atomic number (Zeff). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with Ki-67 expression levels.

Results: Results showed that high Ki-67 expression correlated with significantly higher Zeff and IC values in the venous phase (VP) (P = 0.047 and P = 0.049, respectively; AUC = 0.67 for both), and lower WC in the arterial phase (AP) (P = 0.021; AUC = 0.70). Multivariate analysis revealed that IC in VP and WC in AP were independent predictors of Ki-67 overexpression. The combination of these two parameters yielded an AUC of 0.78 for predicting Ki-67 overexpression, with 68.3% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, and 73.7% accuracy.

Conclusions: DECT parameters demonstrate potential for non-invasive Ki-67 status detection in ESCC, offering valuable insights for clinical diagnosis and prognosis.

Keywords: Ki-67 expression; dual-energy CT (DECT); esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; nomogram; quantitative parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 74-year-old male patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) exhibiting low Ki-67 expression, grade 2, without neurovascular invasion or lymph node metastasis. Panels (A–D) show the 70-keV monochromatic contrast-enhanced CT image, iodine-based map, effective atomic number (Zeff) map, and spectral curve derived from the arterial phase (AP) scans. Panels (E–H) display the same imaging parameters derived from the venous phase (VP) scans.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve of the combined parameters for predicting Ki-67 expression in ESCC. IC, Iodine concentration; WC, Water concentrations; Zeff, Effective atomic number; AP, Arterial phase; VP, Venous phase.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Dual-energy CT (DECT) nomogram for evaluating the Ki-67 expression in ESCC. IC, Iodine concentration; WC, Water concentrations; AP, Arterial phase; VP, Venous phase.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Decision curve analysis of the nomogram model. The nomogram demonstrated good calibration performance and provided the highest clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold values, particularly demonstrating a positive net benefit within the threshold ranges of 0.12–0.99.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calibration curve of the nomogram model. The curve was generated using bootstrap resampling (B = 200). The dashed blue line represents the ideal calibration line where predicted probabilities perfectly match observed outcomes. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant lack of fit (p = 0.12), indicating good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zhu H, Ma X, Ye T, Wang H, Wang Z, Liu Q, et al. Esophageal cancer in China: Practice and research in the new era. Int J Cancer. (2023) 152:1741–51. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34301, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weidenbaum C, Gibson MK. Approach to localized squamous cell cancer of the esophagus. Curr Treat options Oncol. (2022) 23:1370–87. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-01003-w, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang YK, Karmakar R, Mukundan A, Men TC, Tsao YM, Lu SC, et al. Computer-aided endoscopic diagnostic system modified with hyperspectral imaging for the classification of esophageal neoplasms. Front Oncol. (2024) 14:1423405. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1423405, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang PC, Huang CW, Karmakar R, Mukundan A, Chen TH, Chou CK, et al. Precision imaging for early detection of esophageal cancer. Bioengineering (Basel Switzerland). (2025) 12. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010090, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources