Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 25.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03861-x. Online ahead of print.

Pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation into a brain-dead recipient

Affiliations

Pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation into a brain-dead recipient

Jianxing He et al. Nat Med. .

Abstract

Genetically engineered pig lungs have not previously been transplanted into humans, leaving key questions unanswered regarding the human immune response in the context of a xenotransplanted lung and the possibility of hyperacute rejection. Here, we report a case of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, in which a lung from a six-gene-edited pig was transplanted into a 39-year-old brain-dead male human recipient following a brain hemorrhage. The lung xenograft maintained viability and functionality over the course of the 216 hours of the monitoring period, without signs of hyperacute rejection or infection. Severe edema resembling primary graft dysfunction was observed at 24 hours after transplantation, potentially due to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Antibody-mediated rejection appeared to contribute to xenograft damage on postoperative days 3 and 6, with partial recovery by day 9. Immunosuppression included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, basiliximab, rituximab, eculizumab, tofacitinib, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and tapering steroids, with adjustments made during the postoperative period based on assessments of immune status. Although this study demonstrates the feasibility of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, substantial challenges relating to organ rejection and infection remain, and further preclinical studies are necessary before clinical translation of this procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: D.P. is a co-founder of Chengdu Clonorgan Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Chengdu, China. The other authors declare competing interests.

References

    1. Chisholm-Burns, M., Kelly, B. S. & Spivey, C. A. Xenotransplantation could either be a friend or foe of healthcare equity. Commun. Med. (Lond.) 4, 85 (2024). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Mohiuddin, M. M. et al. Graft dysfunction in compassionate use of genetically engineered pig-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation: a case report. Lancet 402, 397–410 (2023). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Mallapaty, S. & Kozlov, M. First pig kidney transplant in a person: what it means for the future. Nature 628, 13–14 (2024). - PubMed
    1. Wang, Y. et al. Pig-to-human kidney xenotransplants using genetically modified minipigs. Cell Rep. Med. 5, 101744 (2024). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Burdorf, L. et al. Pig-to-baboon lung xenotransplantation: extended survival with targeted genetic modifications and pharmacologic treatments. Am. J. Transplant. 22, 28–45 (2022). - PubMed