Prognostic Factors in Sinonasal Cancers: A Multicenter Pooled Analysis
- PMID: 40856008
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.70044
Prognostic Factors in Sinonasal Cancers: A Multicenter Pooled Analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Sinonasal cancers (SNC) are heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior. We aimed to identify prognostic factors in non-metastatic (M0)-SNC.
Methods: Electronic health records from M0-SNC patients treated with definitive surgery ± postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy at two tertiary institutions were reviewed. p16 staining was performed in the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) subset. Multivariable analysis (MVA) calculated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for histology type (SCC as the comparator), T/N categories, and primary treatment modality for the risk of locoregional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and deaths.
Results: A total of 376 patients were eligible including 209 (56%) SCC (p16+: 35; p16-/untested: 157), 42 (11%) adenocarcinoma, 35 (9%) sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma or sinonasal neuroendocrine tumors (SNUC/SNEC), 33 (9%) mucosal melanoma (MM), 30 (8%) esthesioneuroblastoma (ES), and 27 (7%) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). MVA identified MM histology (aHR 2.03, 95% CI 21.23-3.33), older age (aHR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03), T3-4 tumor (aHR 5.08, 95% CI 2.77-9.30), and nodal involvement (aHR: 2.15, 95% CI 1.46-3.16) carried higher mortality risk (all p < 0.05); MM (aHR 10.14, 95% CI 4.90-21.01), ACC (aHR 2.97, 95% CI 1.27-6.96), and SNUC/SNEC (aHR 6.80, 95% CI 3.30-14.01) histologies and T3-4 categories (vs. T1-2, HR 4.79, 95% CI 1.53-14.95) had higher DM risk; T3-4 (aHR 2.33, 95% CI 1.37-3.97) and nodal involvement (aHR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.60) conveyed higher LRF risk while SNUC/SNEC histologies had a lower LRF risk (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-3.33).
Conclusions: Different SNC histology types exhibit distinct patterns of relapse and survival, highlighting the need for different management strategies.
Keywords: chemotherapy; head and neck cancer treatment; radiotherapy; sinonasal cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; trimodality treatment.
© 2025 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
-
- J. L. Llorente, F. López, C. Suárez, and M. A. Hermsen, “Sinonasal Carcinoma: Clinical, Pathological, Genetic and Therapeutic Advances,” Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology 11, no. 8 (2014): 460–472, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.97.
-
- V. J. Lund, H. Stammberger, P. Nicolai, et al., “European Position Paper on Endoscopic Management of Tumours of the Nose, Paranasal Sinuses and Skull Base,” Rhinology. Supplement 22 (2010): 1–143.
-
- R. Dutta, P. M. Dubal, P. F. Svider, J. K. Liu, S. Baredes, and J. A. Eloy, “Sinonasal Malignancies: A Population‐Based Analysis of Site‐Specific Incidence and Survival: Sinonasal Malignancies,” Laryngoscope 125, no. 11 (2015): 2491–2497, https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25465.
-
- S. Jain, Y. Li, E. C. Kuan, B. A. Tajudeen, and P. S. Batra, “Prognostic Factors in Paranasal Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis,” Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base 80, no. 3 (2019): 258–263, https://doi.org/10.1055/s‐0038‐1669420.
-
- J. H. Turner and D. D. Reh, “Incidence and Survival in Patients With Sinonasal Cancer: A Historical Analysis of Population‐Based Data,” Head and Neck 34, no. 6 (2012): 877–885, https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21830.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
