Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985;61(1):73-86.
doi: 10.1007/BF00235622.

Somatosensory representation of the climbing fiber system in the rostral intermediate cerebellum

Somatosensory representation of the climbing fiber system in the rostral intermediate cerebellum

L T Robertson. Exp Brain Res. 1985.

Abstract

The fine grain organization of the climbing fiber (CF) representation for the intermediate cortex of lobules III, IV, and Va was examined. Data were obtained from cats anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital. Through extracellular recording techniques, CF responses were identified in 814 Purkinje cells; 74% were elicited by mechanical stimulation of various body surfaces. Of the CF responses elicited by stimulation, 60% involved the ipsilateral hindlimb, 36% represented parts of the forelimb, and only 4% represented areas of the face, tail, or abdomen. Hindlimb representation predominated in lobules III and IV, and forelimb representation was mainly confined to lobule Va. No distinct parasagittal zones that involved all three lobules were identified. In general, the organization for most sublobules could be best described as a mixture of patches of forelimb or hindlimb representations. Within the patches there was considerable diversity of receptive field types, particularly for the extremities. The receptive fields involving the distal phalanges were generally smaller than those for the proximal areas, but a range in field sizes was evident for both distal and proximal regions. More than half of either the forelimb or the hindlimb representation was limited to the distal paw areas; the two middle toes received the most frequent representation. Representations of the proximal limb areas were generally centered around either the wrist or the heel, or around the elbow or knee, but many of these receptive fields also extended to the phalanges. The multiple representation of various areas of forelimb and hindlimb throughout the rostral intermediate cortex was consistent with the type of organization that had been identified in other regions of the anterior lobe, although each cortical area contained a unique proportional CF representation of various body areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brain Res. 1980 Jan 6;181(1):17-30 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1985 Feb 22;232(4):523-33 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1984 May 20;225(3):458-68 - PubMed
    1. Brain Behav Evol. 1978;15(2):141-9 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1983 Apr 1;215(2):228-43 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources