Outcomes Vary by Surgical Approach for Hemiarthroplasty After Low-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Study of the Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture Consortium
- PMID: 40856490
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003062
Outcomes Vary by Surgical Approach for Hemiarthroplasty After Low-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Study of the Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture Consortium
Abstract
Objectives: To compare hemiarthroplasty (HA) outcomes for low-energy femoral neck fracture (FNF) among a direct anterior approach (DAA), direct lateral approach (DLA), and posterior approach (PA).
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Nine level-1 tertiary academic centers.
Patient selection criteria: All patients from January 2010 through December 2019 undergoing HA for a low-energy FNF (AO/OTA 31B1-3). Exclusion criteria were pathologic fractures, concomitant acetabular fractures, and high-energy mechanisms.
Outcome measure and comparisons: Multivariable regression models were constructed for outcomes among DAA and DLA compared with PA including mortality, revision, and infection. It was hypothesized that anterior approaches would be independently associated with fewer postoperative complications including infection, dislocation, and mortality.
Results: A total of 956 consecutive patients with FNF treated with HA using DAA (n = 71; 7.4%; mean (SD) age 82.6 (8.5) years), DLA [n = 252; 26.4%; mean (SD) age 81.3 (10.8) years] or PA [n = 633; 66.2%; mean (SD) age 79.2 (10.9) years] were included. There were no differences in sex among groups ( P = 0.83). The DAA was independently associated with higher periprosthetic joint infection rates at 90 days [Odd's Ratio (OR), 7.295; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.35‒22.61; P < 0.001] and 1-year (OR, 5.769; 95% CI, 1.93‒17.22; P = 0.002), as was the DLA at 90 days (OR, 2.952; 95% CI, 1.29‒6.74; P = 0.010) and 1-year (OR, 3.047; 95% CI, 1.43‒6.50; P = 0.004). The DLA was associated with lower 90-day dislocation (OR, 0.129; 95% CI, 0.03‒0.60; P = 0.009), 1-year dislocation (OR, 0.175; 95% CI, 0.05‒0.63; P = 0.008), and greater independent ambulation at discharge (OR, 3.273; 95% CI, 2.00‒5.37; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Among HA for low-energy femoral neck fracture, the lateral approach was associated with decreased dislocation postoperatively and greater independent ambulation at discharge, but with decreased ambulatory distance compared to a posterior approach. Furthermore, the anterior and lateral approaches were associated with increased infection versus a posterior approach.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Keywords: femoral neck fracture; hemiarthroplasty; outcomes; surgical approach.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Stronach BM, Bergin PF, Perez JL, et al. The rising use of total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the United States. Hip Int. 2020;30:107–113.
-
- Mundi S, Pindiprolu B, Simunovic N, et al. Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over the past 31 years. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:54–59.
-
- Neyisci C, Erdem Y, Bilekli AB, et al. Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e919993.
-
- Thürig G, Schmitt JW, Slankamenac K, et al. Safety of total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures using the direct anterior approach: a retrospective observational study in 86 elderly patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2016;10:12.
-
- Fullam J, Theodosi PG, Charity J, et al. A scoping review comparing two common surgical approaches to the hip for hemiarthroplasty. BMC Surg. 2019;19:32.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
