Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 26.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01784-z. Online ahead of print.

Visual versus verbal: Assessing probe efficacy across modality and time delays in the Concealed Information Test

Affiliations

Visual versus verbal: Assessing probe efficacy across modality and time delays in the Concealed Information Test

Yi-Chen Tsai et al. Mem Cognit. .

Abstract

The Concealed Information Test (CIT), also known as the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), is a method of deception detection by presenting the suspects with familiar stimuli that only the culprits would recognize. Because recognition memory is crucial to the success of reaction time-based CIT, in this study we investigated how pictorial and verbal crime-related items (i.e., Probes) of a visually experienced mock crime would perform against time delay and memory deterioration. Participants visually encoded the details of a theft mock crime from a first-person perspective and were randomly assigned to one of the Probe modalities (i.e., verbal vs. pictorial) group and one of the time delays (immediate vs. 2-week delay) group: immediate verbal, immediate pictorial, 2-week verbal, 2-week pictorial. We observed significant Probe-Irrelevant RT difference in all 4 conditions. When we evaluated the ability of each condition to differentiate between guilty and innocent by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, we observed a significant effect of time delay, with higher AUCs in the immediate condition compared to the 2-week delay, and no difference between verbal and pictorial modalities. Together, our results suggest that for visually experienced events, CIT effects can be observed 1) both with pictorial or verbal Probes, 2) both immediately and after 2 weeks, and 3) importantly, although pictorial and verbal Probes perform equally well, a 2-week delay would cost CIT efficacy in AUC.

Keywords: Concealed Information Test; Guilty Knowledge Test; Memory modality; Recognition memory; Visual memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: The experiment was approved by the Joint Institutional Review Board (JIRB) at Taipei Medical University (TMU). JIRB reference number: N202103160. All participants consented to participate in the experiment. Consent to participation: All participants gave written informed consent prior to taking part in this study. Consent for publication: On the consent page/form, participants were notified that this study was done for research purpose and that their data were anonymized. But we did not ask for explicit consent for publication on our consent page/form. Competing interests:: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ambach, W., Bursch, S., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2010). A concealed information test with multimodal measurement. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben-Shakhar, G. (2012). Current research and potential applications of the concealed information test: An overview. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 342. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Gati, I. (1987). Common and distinctive features of verbal and pictorial stimuli as determinants of psychophysiological responsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(2), 91–105. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Shakhar, G., Frost, R., Gati, I., & Kresh, Y. (1996). Is an apple a fruit? Semantic relatedness as reflected by psychophysiological responsivity. Psychophysiology, 33(6), 671–679. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources