Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 26.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02055-7. Online ahead of print.

Child caregiving and cancer screening: a nationally representative analysis

Anisha P Ganguly  1   2 , Darren A DeWalt  3   4 , Alison T Brenner  3   5 , Daniel S Reuland  3   5 , Seth A Berkowitz  3   4
Affiliations

Child caregiving and cancer screening: a nationally representative analysis

Anisha P Ganguly et al. Cancer Causes Control. .

Abstract

Purpose: Preliminary studies have suggested child caregivers ('caregivers') may experience childcare barriers to cancer screening. The objective of this study was to compare cancer screening adherence among caregivers and non-caregivers in a nationally representative sample.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used 2021-2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data. Caregivers were defined as adults 18-65 employed as a 'homemaker' with child(ren) in the home. The primary outcome was colorectal cancer screening adherence, and secondary outcomes were breast and cervical cancer screening adherence. Relative risks (RR) of screening adherence were estimated using regression models adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, education, payer status, marital status, employment, language, self-rated health, and year. Models used survey standard error estimation and sampling weights. Sensitivity analyses tested two alternative caregiver definitions: adults 18-65 with child(ren) and employed adults 18-65 with child(ren).

Results: There were 1,317,148 participants (weighted: 255,041,726); 2.9% of the weighted sample were caregivers, 95.3% of whom were women. Most caregivers were married or partnered, identified as non-white, and reported <$50,000 for household income. In adjusted analyses, caregiver status was associated with significantly lower rates of colorectal (aRR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.98) and breast (aRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98) cancer screening adherence, but not cervical cancer screening adherence (aRR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95-1.09). Sensitivity analyses with alternative caregiver definitions similarly showed lower rates of colorectal and breast cancer screening adherence but not for cervical cancer screening.

Conclusion: Caregivers had lower adherence to colorectal and breast cancer screening but not cervical cancer screening, consistent across multiple exposure definitions. Child caregiving may pose barriers to cancer screening.

Keywords: Cancer screening; Caregiving; Childcare; Social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and informed consent: As this analysis utilized de-identified data from a publicly available dataset, this study is not deemed human subjects research and thereby does not require institutional review board approval or informed consent. Informed consent is obtained among participants in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

References

    1. von Wagner C, Good A, Whitaker KL, Wardle J (2011) Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev 33:135–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxq018 - DOI
    1. Sedani AE, Gomez SL, Lawrence WR et al (2025) Social risks and nonadherence to recommended cancer screening among US adults. JAMA Netw Open 8:e2449556. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49556 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kurani SS, McCoy RG, Lampman MA et al (2020) Association of neighborhood measures of social determinants of health with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in the US midwest. JAMA Netw Open 3:e200618. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0618 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Castaldi M, Smiley A, Kechejian K et al (2022) Disparate access to breast cancer screening and treatment. BMC Womens Health 22:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01793-z - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Pohl AL, Aderonmu AA, Grab JD et al (2025) Transportation insecurity, social support, and adherence to cancer screening. JAMA Netw Open 8:e2457336. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57336 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources