Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Sep;40(5):767-779.
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2024.360. Epub 2025 Aug 26.

Automatic quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic aortic plaques in patients with embolic cerebral infarction using deep learning

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Automatic quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic aortic plaques in patients with embolic cerebral infarction using deep learning

Hye Jin Bang et al. Korean J Intern Med. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background/aims: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a commonly used imaging modality for assessing embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in clinical practice. We aimed to develop an automatic plaque segmentation model based on U-net and evaluate its clinical usefulness in patients with ESUS.

Methods: We used two aorta image sets. TEE aortic images of 711 patients visiting two cardiovascular centers for various causes were randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets to automatically segment plaques and estimate the aortic plaque area (APA) and aortic plaque ratio (APR) using U-net. The model was tested in a clinical data set of patients with ESUS who attended three cardiovascular centers to determine whether it could predict a composite cardiovascular event in those patients.

Results: The mean intersection of over union to assess the accuracy of the U-net model was 0.997 ± 0.002 and 0.997 ± 0.001 for the model development and clinical application data sets, respectively. When using the U-net-based model, the APA and APR significantly differed between complex and simple aortic plaques (p < 0.001). However, unlike complex aortic plaques measured in clinical practice, APA or APR estimated by U-net models or manual segmentation did not show additional value in predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Conclusion: The estimation of APA and APR by the U-net model could be helpful in predicting complex aortic plaques. Additional comprehensive quantitative image analysis of plaque characteristics using artificial intelligence, such as movability and morphology, may be needed to predict prognosis.

Keywords: Aorta; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Embolic stroke; Transesophageal echocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram indicating patient selection for the training, validation, and test sets for developing the U-net algorithm. The developed U-net algorithm was then tested with a clinical dataset including transthoracic echocardiographic images from patients with embolic cerebral ischemia. CHUH, Chungnam National University Hospital; CNUH, Chonnam National University Hospital; DJCMC, Daejeon Catholic Medical Center.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Ground-truth image (upper panel) and an image automatically segmented with U-net (lower panel) provide the plaque area based on the pixels in the image. (B) The plaque aorta ratio was assessed as a quantitative plaque measurement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A, B) Correlation of quantitative plaque characteristics between the ground-truth images and U-net for complex and simple aortic plaques. (C, D) Bland–Altman plots showing the average plotted against the difference in aortic plaque area and plaque aorta ratio between the ground truth and U-net measurements. (E, F) Model performance in the clinical application set for predicting complex aortic plaques. (G) Kaplan–Meier curve showing the clinical significance of complex aortic plaques using the traditional method to assess the clinical data set in terms of long-term clinical follow-up. AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Among the cases, there were subtle differences in the plaque aortic ratio between the U-net model and manual model as ground truth. Humans tended to create a smooth line around the adventitia, but U-net used a more irregular margin around the adventitia in its segmentation.
None

References

    1. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795–820. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caplan LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology. 1989;39:1246–1250. - PubMed
    1. Amarenco P, Cohen A, Tzourio C, et al. Atherosclerotic disease of the aortic arch and the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1474–1479. - PubMed
    1. French Study of Aortic Plaques in Stroke Group Amarenco P, Cohen A, Hommel M, Moulin T, Leys D, Bousser MG. Atherosclerotic disease of the aortic arch as a risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1216–1221. - PubMed
    1. Hart RG, Catanese L, Perera KS, Ntaios G, Connolly SJ. Embolic stroke of undetermined source: a systematic review and clinical update. Stroke. 2017;48:867–872. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources