Platelet inhibition strategies in rescue stenting after failed thrombectomy: a large retrospective multicenter registry
- PMID: 40860647
- PMCID: PMC12374045
- DOI: 10.1177/17562864251360913
Platelet inhibition strategies in rescue stenting after failed thrombectomy: a large retrospective multicenter registry
Abstract
Background: Rescue stenting (RS) is a bailout strategy for failed thrombectomy. Optimal platelet inhibition strategy after RS remains unclear.
Objectives: We aimed to describe and compare different platelet inhibition strategies during/after RS.
Design: Retrospective cohort study across 34 international centers.
Methods: Patients with large vessel occlusion and RS after failed thrombectomy (2019-2023) were included. Periprocedural and postprocedural platelet inhibition strategies were described and compared, focusing on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We assessed the effects of platelet inhibition strategy and potentially covariates on the primary outcome of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) using ordinal shift analysis with proportional odds models.
Results: RS was performed in 589 patients (mean age 67.9 years, 60.8% male). Numerous combinations of platelet inhibitors were administered. Periprocedural GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 61.5% of patients. Postprocedural DAPT was administered to 80.5% and SAPT to 13.3%. Functional independence (mRS 0-2) was achieved in 40.7%, while 26.3% died within 90 days. Stent occlusion occurred in 20.5%, with 67.6% of these occlusions within 24 h. Postprocedural stent-occlusion was independently associated with worse functional outcome at 90 days (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3-7.2, p < 0.001). No significant association between periprocedural GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, and 90-day mRS or stent occlusion was found. Postprocedural SAPT was associated with worse functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.0, p = 0.02), higher mortality (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.05-4.0, p = 0.03), and increased stent occlusion rates (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 2.3-9.7, p < 0.001) compared to postprocedural DAPT. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 6.8% of patients, with no significant difference between antiplatelet regimens.
Conclusion: Extensive heterogeneity exists in platelet inhibition strategies following RS. Stent occlusion is associated with worse clinical outcomes, and the first 24 h post-RS are critical for stent patency. Compared to SAPT, DAPT was associated with better functional outcome, lower mortality, and lower stent occlusion rates.
Keywords: intracranial arteriosclerosis; ischemic stroke; platelet aggregation inhibitors; stents; thrombectomy.
Plain language summary
When clot removal for stroke fails and a stent is placed, different blood thinner treatments affect risk of stent blockage and outcomes When doctors try to remove a blood clot during a stroke but are unsuccessful, they sometimes place a stent to reopen the blocked artery—a procedure called “rescue stenting.” After placing a stent, patients need blood-thinning medications to prevent the stent from becoming blocked again. However, the best way to manage these medications is unclear. In this study, we looked at 589 patients from 34 hospitals around the world who had rescue stenting between 2019 and 2023. We compared different strategies for using blood thinners, including strong drugs given during the procedure and either one (“single”) or two (“dual”) blood thinners given afterward. We found a lot of variation in how doctors used these medications. Using a strong blood thinner during the procedure didn’t seem to change long-term recovery or the risk of the stent blocking. However, after the procedure, patients who were treated with two blood thinners did better than those who got only one. Patients on dual therapy were more likely to recover well, less likely to die, and less likely to have their stent block again. Importantly, most stent blockages happened within the first 24 hours after the procedure, and patients with stent blockages did worse, highlighting the 24h period as critical for blood thinner treatment.
© The Author(s), 2025.
Figures
References
-
- Katan M, Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Sem Neurol 2018; 38: 208–211. - PubMed
-
- Nguyen TN, Abdalkader M, Fischer U, et al. Endovascular management of acute stroke. Lancet 2024; 404: 1265–1278. - PubMed
-
- Gory B, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, et al. Predictors for mortality after mechanical thrombectomy of acute basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 45: 61–67. - PubMed
-
- Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–1731. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
