Ream and Run Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Shoulder Treatments for Glenohumeral Arthritis
- PMID: 40861556
- PMCID: PMC12377412
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.88813
Ream and Run Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Shoulder Treatments for Glenohumeral Arthritis
Abstract
Glenohumeral arthritis is commonly managed by total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), but risks of TSA failure due to its prosthetic glenoid component raise serious concerns, prompting some patients to turn to the ream and run technique (RnR) as an alternative procedure that avoids such complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes of patients who underwent TSA or RnR treatment for glenohumeral arthritis. A total of 668 shoulders from a total of 666 patients were included, with 325 shoulders undergoing RnR and 343 shoulders undergoing TSA. Significant postoperative improvements in simple shoulder test (SST) score (RnR: 4.99, TSA: 4.51), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (RnR: 40.50, TSA: 40.22), external rotation (RnR: 21.22º, TSA: 19.72º), and forward elevation (RnR: 24.75º, TSA: 40.50º) were found in both cohorts. A significant reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (RnR: -4.08, TSA: 3.93) was also found in both cohorts. Meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference between treatments across every outcome measure of the study. Both RnR and TSA techniques significantly improve pain and increase functionality and mobility in patients with glenohumeral arthritis. These findings have significant implications for clinical practice moving forward, as they offer clinicians and patients an additional treatment option with comparable outcomes.
Keywords: glenohumeral arthritis; hemiarthroplasty; joint preservation; ream and run; shoulder arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2025, Roelker et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures








References
-
- The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020. Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, Boulton C, et al. https://europepmc.org/article/med/33439585 National Joint Registry, London. 2020 - PubMed
-
- Parameters influencing glenoid loosening. Karelse A, Van Tongel A, Van Isacker T, Berghs B, De Wilde L. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13:773–784. - PubMed
-
- What is the optimal management of a loose glenoid component after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. Sharareh B, Yao JJ, Matsen FA 3rd, Hsu JE. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32:653–661. - PubMed
-
- Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:604–613. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials