Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 14;13(8):367.
doi: 10.3390/dj13080367.

Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Shrinkage Stress in Adhesive Class III Cavities Restored with Different Resin Composite Combinations-A 3D-FEA Study

Elisa Donaria Aboucauch Grassi  1 , Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade  2 , Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho  1 , Roberta Gasparro  3 , Mauro Mariniello  3 , Angelo Aliberti  3 , Pietro Ausiello  3 , Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Shrinkage Stress in Adhesive Class III Cavities Restored with Different Resin Composite Combinations-A 3D-FEA Study

Elisa Donaria Aboucauch Grassi et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Objectives: To study the effects of internal and marginal polymerization shrinkage stress and distribution in different resin composite class III dental restorations in relation to the restorative technique using numerical finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: A 3D model of a human hemi-maxilla with a sound maxillary central incisor were created. Four class III distal cavities were shaped and differently restored. Four groups of resin composite combinations were analyzed: group C (three increments of conventional composite); group B (two increments of bulk-fill composite); group FC (flowable base + three increments of conventional composite); and group FB (flowable bulk-fill base + two increments of conventional composite). The resulting four models were exported to FEA software for static structural analysis. Polymerization shrinkage was simulated using thermal analogy, and stress distribution was analyzed using the Maximum Principal Stress criterion at the marginal and internal cavity interfaces. Results: Group FC showed the highest stress at the level in the proximal region (9.05 MPa), while group FB showed the lowest (4.48 MPa). FB also exhibited the highest internal dentin stress, indicating potential risks for long-term bond degradation. In the cavo-surface incisal angle, the average peak stress across all groups was 3.76 MPa. At the cervical cavo-surface angle, stress values were 3.3 MPa (C), ~3.36 MPa (B), 3.41 MPa (FC), and 3.27 MPa (FB). Conclusions: Restorative technique did not significantly influence marginal stress distribution in class III composite restorations. However, the bevel area at the cervical margin showed the highest concentration of shrinkage stress.

Keywords: class III dental restoration; composite resins; dental materials; dental restoration; finite element analysis; polymerization shrinkage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Left Hemi-maxilla modeling (a); Model mesh representation (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Groups division.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Maximal Principal Stress in each increment (MPa).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histogram—Shrinkage Stress Concentration (Enamel) vs. Loading Frequency.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histogram—Shrinkage Stress Concentration (Dentin) vs. Frequency.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shah Y.R., Shiraguppi V.L., Deosarkar B.A., Shelke U.R. Long-term survival and reasons for failure in direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic review. J. Conserv. Dent. 2021;24:415–420. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_527_21. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demarco F.F., Collares K., Correa M.B., Cenci M.S., Moraes R.R., Opdam N.J. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz. Oral Res. 2017;31((Suppl. S1)):e56. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demarco F.F., Collares K., Coelho-de-Souza F.H., Correa M.B., Cenci M.S., Moraes R.R., Opdam N.J. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent. Mater. 2015;31:1214–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ausiello P., Ciaramella S., De Benedictis A., Lanzotti A., Tribst J.P.M., Watts D.C. The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: A 3D-FEA. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2021;24:485–495. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soares C.J., Faria-E-Silva A.L., Rodrigues M.P., Vilela A.B.F., Pfeifer C.S., Tantbirojn D., Versluis A. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements—What do we need to know? Braz. Oral Res. 2017;31((Suppl. S1)):e62. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0062. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources