Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 13;13(8):103.
doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13080103.

Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges

Affiliations

Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges

Giovanni Emanuele Corazza et al. J Intell. .

Abstract

Creativity is the primary driver of our cultural evolution. The astonishing potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and its possible application in the creative process poses an urgent and dramatic challenge for humanity; how can we maximize the benefits of AI while minimizing the associated risks? In this article, we identify all forms of human-AI collaboration in this realm as cyber-creativity. We introduce the following two forward-looking scenarios: a utopian vision for cyber-creativity, in which AI serves to enhance and not replace human creativity, and a dystopian view associated with the pre-emption of all human creative agency caused by the rise of AI. In our view, the scientific community is called to bring its contribution, however small, to help humanity make steps towards the utopian scenario, while avoiding the dystopian one. Here, we present a decalogue of research challenges identified for this purpose, touching upon the following dimensions: (1) the theoretical framework for cyber-creativity; (2) sociocultural perspectives; (3) the cyber-creative process; (4) the creative agent; (5) the co-creative team; (6) cyber-creative products; (7) cyber-creative domains; (8) cyber-creative education; (9) ethical aspects; and (10) the dark side of cyber-creativity. For each dimension, a brief review of the state-of-the-art is provided, followed by the identification of a main research challenge, then specified into a list of research questions. Whereas there is no claim that this decalogue of research challenges represents an exhaustive classification, which would be an impossible objective, it still should serve as a valid starting point for future (but urgent) research endeavors, with the ambition to provide a significant contribution to the understanding, development, and alignment of AI to human values the realm of creativity.

Keywords: AI; artificial intelligence; creative process; creativity; cyber-creativity; education; ethics; sociocultural creativity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The decalogue of challenges for research in cyber-creativity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The DA VINCI model for the creative process (Corazza 2025a).

References

    1. Agudo Ujué, Liberal Karlos G., Arrese Miren, Matute Helena. The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2024;9:1. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00529-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali Sajid, Abuhmed Tamer, El-Sappagh Shaker, Muhammad Khan, Alonso-Moral Jose M., Confalonieri Roberto, Guidotti Riccardo, Ser Javier Del, Díaz-Rodríguez Natalia, Herrera Francisco. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Information Fusion. 2023;99:101805. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805. - DOI
    1. Anantrasirichai Nantheera, Bull David. Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2022;55:589–656. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7. - DOI
    1. Baas Matthijs, Roskes Marieke, Koch Severine, Cheng Yujie, Dreu Carsten K. W. De. Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2019;45:1590–602. doi: 10.1177/0146167219838551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakker Michiel, Chadwick Martin, Sheahan Hannah, Tessler Michael, Campbell-Gillingham Lucy, Balaguer Jan, McAleese Nat, Glaese Amelia, Aslanides John, Botvinick Matthew M., et al. Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022;35:38176–89.

LinkOut - more resources