Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1985 Winter;18(4):275-88.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-275.

Movement suppression time-out for undesirable behavior in psychotic and severely developmentally delayed children

Case Reports

Movement suppression time-out for undesirable behavior in psychotic and severely developmentally delayed children

A Rolider et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Winter.

Abstract

The effects of a movement suppression time-out, which involved punishing any movement or verbalization while a client is in the time-out area, were evaluated in four experiments. The first experiment examined the effects of a DRO procedure and movement suppression plus DRO in suppressing self-injurious behavior in a psychotic child in three different situations. In Experiment 2, the results of the previous experiment were replicated with two dangerous behaviors in a second psychotic child. In a third experiment, movement suppression plus DRO was compared with contingent restraint in reducing inappropriate poking behavior in two settings. The movement suppression procedure eliminated poking whereas contingent restraint had little effect. In the final experiment, movement suppression time-out alone was compared with exclusionary time-out alone and simple corner time-out alone. Self-stimulation occurred at high levels during the exclusionary and simple corner time-out procedures. Self-stimulation was either suppressed or reduced during movement suppression time-out. The movement suppression time-out procedure produced a larger reduction in the target behavior in all three children. The effectiveness of the movement suppression procedure was explained in terms of the suppression of self-stimulation while the time-out procedure was being applied.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Winter;16(4):435-45 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):225-41 - PubMed
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Feb;5(1):1-9 - PubMed
    1. Fed Proc. 1979 May;38(6):1979-83 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):415-24 - PubMed

Publication types