Dietary factors and colorectal cancer risk in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
- PMID: 40866745
- PMCID: PMC12630220
- DOI: 10.1007/s10552-025-02053-9
Dietary factors and colorectal cancer risk in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
Abstract
Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Few studies have examined the preventive effects of dietary factors against CRC in Asian populations. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize and analyze current evidence on the relationships between various dietary components and the risk of CRC, colon cancer, and rectal cancer in Asian populations.
Methods: We included cohort studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus reporting an association between dietary factors and CRC risk in Asian populations. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the pooled risk estimates. Cochran's Q and I2 statistics were employed to assess heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Egger's tests were used to evaluate publication bias.
Results: Eighty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicated that healthy dietary patterns were associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer (RR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.74-0.97), and calcium intake was linked to a slight reduction in CRC risk (RR = 0.93, 95% CI, 0.86-1.00). Conversely, high total meat consumption was associated with increased risks of CRC (RR = 1.18, 95% CI, 1.03-1.34), and white meat intake was associated with a potential 40% increased risk of rectal cancer (RR = 1.40, 95% CI, 1.00-1.96).
Conclusions: This review suggested that healthy dietary patterns and calcium intake are associated with a lower risk of CRC in Asian populations. Nonetheless, additional studies are warranted to clarify the associations between dietary patterns and CRC risk.
Keywords: Asia; Colorectal cancer; Dietary pattern; Food groups; Meta-analysis.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
