Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):2939.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24198-7.

Development and validation of a risk identification model for frailty in stroke survivors: new evidence from CHARLS

Affiliations

Development and validation of a risk identification model for frailty in stroke survivors: new evidence from CHARLS

Jiaxian Wang et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Stroke survivors with frailty exhibit elevated rates of complications, mortality, disability, and hospital readmission. As frailty represents an early, reversible, and preventable stage of disability, developing a reliable risk identification model is essential. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk model for frailty among stroke survivors using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

Methods: Data were extracted from the CHARLS database. Stroke survivors were identified and assessed across 30 indicators, including socio-demographic, physical, psychological, cognitive, and social variables. The data were divided by year, with 2013 and 2015 as the development set and 2018 and 2020 as the validation set. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was employed for variable selection. Logistic regression models were then developed based on univariate and LASSO-selected predictors. A nomogram was constructed to facilitate risk visualization. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate model calibration and clinical utility.

Findings: A total of 2,188 stroke survivors from the 2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020 follow-ups were included. Approximately 68% exhibited symptoms of frailty. Significant group differences were found by age, marital status, living alone, hypertension, and self-reported health status (all p < 0.05). Age, poor sleep quality, impaired balance, nervousness/anxiety, and living alone emerged as independent risk factors for frailty. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the development and validation sets was 0.833 and 0.838, respectively.

Interpretation: The model derived from CHARLS data identified 5 readily assessable predictors (age, sleep quality, balance, anxiety, and living alone), allowing for early screening of frailty without specialized instruments. It demonstrated superior discriminatory performance compared to models from smaller-sample studies, supporting targeted interventions and providing valuable insights for identifying high-risk stroke survivors.

Interpretation: The model derived from CHARLS data identified 5 readily assessable predictors (age, sleep quality, balance, anxiety, and living alone), allowing for early screening of frailty without specialized instruments. It demonstrated superior discriminatory performance compared to models from smaller-sample studies, supporting targeted interventions and providing valuable insights for identifying high-risk stroke survivors.

Keywords: CHARLS; Frailty; Logistic regression; Risk identification model; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This is a retrospective study based on CHARLS database. Participant information was hidden prior to the study. No participant informed consent was required and there was no ethical conflict. The original version of CHARLS was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015) and all participants signed an informed consent form at the time of participation. The study followed the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the CHARLS Institutional Review Board and followed the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subject selection flow chart of this study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Correlation Heatmap
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Results of the LASSO regression model for the selection of demographic and clinical characteristics (a) Coefficient curve based on the logarithmic (lambda) series: this curve shows the variation in coefficients corresponding to different lambda values. Non-zero coefficients are generated from the best lambda, indicating characteristics important for predicting the risk of frailty. b Best parameter (lambda) in LASSO: this plot shows the variation in log(lambda) relative to the partial likelihood deviation (binomial deviation) curve. The best lambda value within a range of one standard error (1-SE criterion) was found by tenfold cross-validation and minimum criterion selection. The position corresponding to the best lambda is indicated by a virtual vertical line
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Bubble Chart
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Nomogram
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Nomogram ROC curve: A Generated from the development dataset. B Validation dataset Generated from the validation dataset
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Calibration plot: A Development dataset. B Validation dataset
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
DCA curves: A Development dataset. B Validation dataset

References

    1. Sugimoto T, Arai H. Sakurai t:an update on cognitive frailty: its definition, impact, associated factors and underlying mechanisms, and interventions. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;22(2):99–109. - PubMed
    1. Bu F, Deng XH, Zhan NN, Cheng H, Wang ZL, Tang L, Zhao Y, Lyu QY. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for frailty in patients with diabetes. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1): 172. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katan M, Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):208–11. - PubMed
    1. Diebel LWM, Rockwood K. Determination of biological age: geriatric assessment vs biological biomarkers. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23(9):104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang EY, Lam SC. Review of frailty measurement of older people: evaluation of the conceptualization, included domains, psychometric properties, and applicability. Aging Med. 2021;4(4):272–91. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types