Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 20;26(16):8062.
doi: 10.3390/ijms26168062.

Immune Modulation Through KIR-HLA Interactions Influences Cetuximab Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations

Immune Modulation Through KIR-HLA Interactions Influences Cetuximab Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer

María Gómez-Aguilera et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Cetuximab improves survival by combining EGFR inhibition with immune activation. This study evaluated the influence of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR)-mediated immune responses on cetuximab efficacy in 124 metastatic CRC patients: 55 with wild-type (WT) KRAS and 69 with KRAS mutations. Peripheral blood was genotyped for 19 KIR genes and relevant HLA alleles, focusing on key KIR-HLA interactions (2DL1-C2, 3DL1-Bw4, 3DS1-Bw4). KRAS-WT patients showed better outcomes, receiving more treatment cycles (median: 17 vs. 4) and showing slower disease progression (60% vs. 92.8% at 12 months). WT patients had higher frequencies of inhibitory KIRs and the Bw4 allele, with KIR3DS1-Bw4 heterozygosity linked to longer survival (p = 0.013). In KRAS-mutant patients, heterozygous KIR genotypes (AB) and mixed A/B semi-haplotypes were associated with improved survival (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed KIR3DS1-Bw4 as a favorable factor in WT patients and AB genotypes as beneficial in KRAS-mutants. In conclusion, KIR-HLA interactions significantly impact cetuximab efficacy in metastatic CRC, with distinct immunogenetic profiles in WT and KRAS-mutant patients. These results highlight the potential of KIR-HLA profiling to guide personalized treatment strategies.

Keywords: HLA ligands; KIR; anti-EGFR; cetuximab; metastatic colorectal cancer; natural killer cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progression-free survival in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer patients according to KIR2DL5 status. The presence of KIR2DL5 was associated with longer twelve-month progression-free survival (PFS12) in KRAS-mutant patients treated with cetuximab.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free survival in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients according to KIR–ligand combinations. (A) The combination of KIR3DS1 with the Bw4 ligand was associated with longer twelve-month progression-free survival (PFS12) in KRAS wild-type (WT) patients treated with cetuximab. (B) Among KRAS-WT patients with KIR3DS1, those who were heterozygous for Bw4 (Bw4Bw6) showed longer PFS12 compared to Bw4 homozygotes (Bw4Bw4) or Bw6 homozygotes (Bw6Bw6).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer patients according to KIR haplotypes. Among KRAS-mutant patients treated with cetuximab, those with heterozygous (AB) KIR haplotypes, comprising one activating (B) and one inhibitory (A) haplotype, demonstrated significantly longer twelve-month progression-free survival (PFS12) compared to homozygous patients (AA or BB).

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cervantes A., Adam R., Roselló S., Arnold D., Normanno N., Taïeb J., Seligmann J., De Baere T., Osterlund P., Yoshino T., et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2023;34:10–32. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E., Cervantes A., Adam R., Sobrero A., Van Krieken J.H., Aderka D., Aguilar E.A., Bardelli A., Benson A., Bodoky G., et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:1386–1422. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235. - DOI - PubMed
    1. García-Foncillas J., Sunakawa Y., Aderka D., Wainberg Z., Ronga P., Witzler P., Stintzing S. Distinguishing Features of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:849. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00849. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saoudi González N., Ros J., Baraibar I., Salvà F., Rodríguez-Castells M., Alcaraz A., García A., Tabernero J., Élez E. Cetuximab as a Key Partner in Personalized Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers. 2024;16:412. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020412. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms