Long-Term Noninvasive Genetic Monitoring Guides Recovery of the Endangered Columbia Basin Pygmy Rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis)
- PMID: 40870004
- PMCID: PMC12386180
- DOI: 10.3390/genes16080956
Long-Term Noninvasive Genetic Monitoring Guides Recovery of the Endangered Columbia Basin Pygmy Rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis)
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Loss and fragmentation of habitat from agricultural conversion led to the near extirpation of the pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis Merriam, 1891) population in the Columbia Basin (CB) of Washington, USA. Recovery efforts began in 2002 and included captive breeding, translocations from other regions for genetic rescue, and reintroduction into native habitat in three sites: Sagebrush Flat (SBF), Beezley Hills (BH), and Chester Butte (CHB). Methods: We used noninvasive and invasive genetic sampling to evaluate demographic and population genetic parameters on three translocated populations of pygmy rabbits over eight years (2011-2020). For each population, our goal was to use fecal DNA sampling and 19 microsatellite loci to monitor spatial distribution, apparent survival rates, genetic diversity, reproduction, effective population size, and the persistence of CB ancestry. Over the course of this study, 1978 rabbits were reintroduced as part of a cooperative conservation effort between state and federal agencies. Results: Through winter and summer monitoring surveys, we detected 168 released rabbits and 420 wild-born rabbits in SBF, 13 released rabbits and 2 wild-born in BH, and 16 released rabbits in CHB. Observed heterozygosity (Ho) values ranged from 0.62-0.84 (SBF), 0.59-0.80 (BH), and 0.73-0.77 (CHB). Allelic richness (AR) ranged from 4.67-5.35 (SBF), 3.71-5.41 (BH), and 3.69-4.65 (CHB). Effective population (Ne) within SBF varied from 12.3 (2012) to 44.3 (2017). CB ancestry persisted in all three wild populations, ranging from 15 to 27%. CB ancestry persisted in 99% of wild-born juveniles identified in SBF. Apparent survival of juvenile rabbits differed across years (1-39%) and was positively associated with release date, release weight, and genetic diversity. Survival of adults (0-43%) was positively influenced by release day, with some evidence that genetic diversity also positively influenced adult apparent survival. Conclusions: Noninvasive genetic sampling has proven to be an effective and efficient tool in monitoring this reintroduced population, assessing both demographic and genetic factors. This data has helped managers address the goals of the Columbia Basin recovery program of establishing multiple sustainable wild populations within the sagebrush steppe habitat of Washington.
Keywords: Brachylagus idahoensis; genetic monitoring; native populations; noninvasive genetic sampling; pygmy rabbits; wildlife.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Conservation genetics of a freshwater turtle (Trachemys hartwegi) in a threatened riverine ecosystem.Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jul 27;52(1):761. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-10858-9. Mol Biol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40715602
-
Translocations contribute to population rescue in an imperiled woodpecker.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 5;122(31):e2410946122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410946122. Epub 2025 Jul 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025. PMID: 40720647 Free PMC article.
-
The fitness consequences of wildlife conservation translocations: a meta-analysis.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Apr;99(2):348-371. doi: 10.1111/brv.13025. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024. PMID: 37844577
-
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39593159 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hedrick P.W., Peterson R.O., Vucetich L.M., Adams J.R., Vucetich J.A. Genetic Rescue in Isle Royale Wolves: Genetic Analysis and the Collapse of the Population. Conserv. Genet. 2014;15:1111–1121. doi: 10.1007/s10592-014-0604-1. - DOI
-
- Stetz J.B., Kendall K.C., Vojta C.D., Genetic Monitoring (GeM) Working Group Genetic Monitoring for Managers: A New Online Resource. J. Fish Wildl. Manag. 2011;2:216–219. doi: 10.3996/082011-JFWM-048. - DOI
-
- Hoban S., Bruford M.W., Funk W.C., Galbusera P., Griffith M.P., Grueber C.E., Heuertz M., Hunter M.E., Hvilsom C., Stroil B.K., et al. Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible. BioScience. 2021;71:964–976. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials