Cytotoxicity of Bulk-Fill Composites on Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth-An In Vitro Study
- PMID: 40870180
- PMCID: PMC12387468
- DOI: 10.3390/ma18163863
Cytotoxicity of Bulk-Fill Composites on Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth-An In Vitro Study
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of bulk-fill composite materials compared to conventional compomers on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth.
Methods: 90 standardized resin composite discs (4 mm thick, 4 mm diameter) were fabricated using a 3D-printed plate, comprising four bulk-fill composites (SDR, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill, VisCalor Bulk, Cention-N) and one compomer (Dyract XP). Samples were polymerized per the manufacturer's instructions and sterilized. Stem cells were isolated from the pulp of exfoliated primary teeth. Cells were cultured and exposed to extracts of the composite materials soaked in culture medium for 24 h. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the MTT colorimetric assay, measuring cell viability via mitochondrial activity, and the Annexin V assay, quantifying apoptosis and necrosis via flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests.
Results: All materials significantly reduced cell viability compared to the control (p < 0.05), with optical density values indicating high cytotoxicity. Tetric EvoCeram exhibited the lowest necrosis and apoptosis levels, while Dyract XP showed the highest necrosis. Statistical analysis revealed no significant cytotoxicity differences among most bulk-fill composites (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Bulk-fill composites and conventional compomer tested exhibit comparable and significant cytotoxic effects on stem cells from human exfoliated primary teeth pulp. While these materials offer clinical advantages in pediatric dentistry due to ease and speed of application, their use underscores the dilemma of balancing operative efficiency with biological safety, and their cytotoxic profiles should be taken into consideration prior to application.
Keywords: MTT assay; annexin V assay; bulk-fill composites; cytotoxicity; primary teeth; stem cells.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Fracture resistance of molars with class II MOD cavities restored with bulk-fill, no-cap flowable bulk-fill, and conventional resin composite restorative systems after 6-months water storage.BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05951-1. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40394542 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of different light-curing modes and curing times on degree of conversion and microhardness of three different bulk-fill composites: an in vitro study.Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Sep 2;29(9):437. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06510-2. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. PMID: 40892080
-
Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.Dent Mater. 2022 May;38(5):e109-e135. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Dent Mater. 2022. PMID: 35221127
-
WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27748505 Free PMC article.
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous